BORIS Johnson could accept a Section 30 order and agree to a second independence referendum, Aberdeen Independence Movement (AIM) has said.
Writing in The National, AIM’s co-organiser Alan Petrie warned the Tories that rejecting indyref2 may come back to bite them.
Petrie said allowing an indyref to take place could buy Prime Minister some time as pressure to resign mounts.
If he rejects a Section 30 order however, he would face an uphill challenge to stop a Yes vote being held, Petrie added.
READ MORE: Real-life dialogue can help bring an end to online Yes infighting
He said: “The decision is not as straightforward as many think and every choice it makes will have political consequences. The decision to accept or reject both come with their own pros and cons.
“The significant advantage of rejecting is a shortlived one – it would play well with the Conservative Party’s more Unionist voters but we are not due to go to the polls again until 2024. After the dust settles, the question for the UK Government would be what now if the Scottish Government sticks with the plan to hold a referendum anyway?”
Petrie said the UK Government could challenge the Scottish Government in court, but warned that could have dire consequences for the No side.
He said it would likely be a “disastrous move that would destroy any pretence of this being a union of free choice based on democracy.”
He went on: “This would be an utterly destructive move, an attempt to save the Union that would instead absolutely torch it.”
The AIM organiser also challenged the idea that boycotting a future indyref could be a silver bullet for Unionists.
“For a boycott to work,” he said. “It would need a united coalition of the three Unionist parties, the unions, the media and civic Scotland behind it. That is not likely to happen today. The media and the Conservatives would likely back it, but what about the others?”
He continued: “A boycott would be a Tory media-led campaign, so would likely be an out-of-touch failure.
READ MORE: Scottish independence campaign set to have 'Yes pledge' at heart
“With only the most hardcore Unionist voters staying at home, a Yes vote would be a certainty.
“The Unionists would likely hope that turnout was low enough to render the whole vote pointless, but that’s a hugely risky strategy.
“Even if it worked, the vote would still undermine the Union, likely being the case that delaying independence would only make it all the more inevitable.”
To read Alan Petrie's column in full, click here.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel