FORMER cabinet minister Andrea Leadsom has become the latest senior Tory to criticise Boris Johnson for his “unacceptable failings of leadership” over lockdown parties in Downing Street.
In a letter to her constituents, Leadsom said the “extent and severity” of the rule-breaking in No 10 exposed in the Sue Gray report meant it was “extremely unlikely” the senior leadership did not know what was going on.
“The conclusion I have drawn from the Sue Gray report is that there have been unacceptable failings of leadership that cannot be tolerated and are the responsibility of the Prime Minister,” she said.
In the message, which was shared on social media, she stopped short of directly calling on Johnson to resign and did not say whether she had submitted a letter calling for a no confidence vote.
Leadsom concluded however by saying: “Each of my Conservative colleagues and I must now decide individually on what is the right course of action that will restore confidence in our Government.”
NEW: Ex Cab min Andrea Leadsom joins critics of PM 👇🏼
— Pippa Crerar (@PippaCrerar) May 31, 2022
“There have been unacceptable failings of leadership that cannot be tolerated and are the responsibility of PM. My colleagues and I must now decide on what is right course of action that will restore confidence in our Govt.” pic.twitter.com/bQcJpfk5kn
Her intervention is a further blow to Johnson as a steady stream of Tory MPs have been calling on the Prime Minister to stand down in the wake of Sue Gray’s report last week.
A committed Brexiteer, Leadsom backed Johnson for the leadership in 2019 after pulling out of the contest herself, underlining the fact that discontent with the Prime Minister extends across the party.
Former foreign secretary William Hague said the Prime Minister is “in real trouble” and that Tory MPs are “moving towards having a ballot” on his leadership.
Allies of Johnson had been hopeful he had escaped unscathed following a relatively muted initial response to Gray’s report last week, but Hague said it is proving to be “one of those sort of slow-fuse explosions in politics”.
“It’s still going along. A lot of people misread it really, the events of last week as meaning the trouble is over, Boris is free and that’s actually not the mood in the Conservative Party, which is very, very troubled about the contents of that report,” he told Times Radio.
“So I think the Conservative Party will need to resolve this one way or another, obviously because to be an effective party they either need to rally behind the Prime Minister they’ve got, or they need to decide to force him out.
“I think they’re moving towards either next week or around the end of June, they are moving towards having a ballot, it looks like that.”
Former education secretary Justine Greening said the Prime Minister needs to “get a grip or get out”, saying there is a “real jitteriness” among Conservative MPs.
Greening, who was among 21 pro-Remain rebels thrown out of the party by Johnson and is now no longer an MP, likened his position to that of Theresa May when she was under fire from Tory Brexiteers.
“There is a real jitteriness around the parliamentary party of following a Prime Minister who isn’t really setting out a clear plan on necessarily where he wants to lead the country,” she told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme.
“We have been here before with Theresa May. The reality is all prime ministers either have to get a grip or get out. That is a political rule that even Boris Johnson will need to follow.”
A steady stream of backbenchers have called on Johnson to go after Gray’s report laid bare a hard-drinking culture at the heart of government while raising renewed claims he misled Parliament.
Under party rules, the chairman of the backbench 1922 Committee Sir Graham Brady must call a vote of confidence in Johnson’s leadership if 54 Tory MPs – 15% of the parliamentary party – submit a letter calling for one.
So far, more than 25 MPs have publicly called on the Prime Minister to stand down – although not all of them have said whether they have written to Brady.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson 'could agree to hold second Scottish independence referendum'
However, it is also widely believed in Westminster that a number of others have put in letters without declaring their intentions amid speculation the tally is approaching the total needed to trigger a vote.
The arts minister, Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay, said it is “pointless” to speculate on numbers but acknowledged the continued uncertainty is a “distraction” as the Government seeks to focus on the cost-of-living crisis.
“It’s pointless speculating about something unless or until it happens,” he told Sky News.
“It’s a distraction from the work of Government, and in Government we’re getting on with making sure that we grow the economy to help with the cost of living.”
READ MORE: Boris Johnson will be remembered by history as our mini-Trump
Following Leadsom's letter on Tuesday, another Tory MP has submitted a letter of no confidence.
Former business secretary John Stevenson publicly submitted a letter of no-confidence in the Prime Minister after saying he was "deeply disappointed" in the rule breaches in Downing Street and Johnson's response to the scandal in the Commons.
Stevenson says he had previously urged Johnson to call for a confidence vote himself to "draw a line" under partygate but was now taking "the appropriate action" to get a vote after seeing the Prime Minister was unwilling to do so.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel