FINANCE Secretary Kate Forbes has said inflation is limiting the Scottish Government’s funding increases.
In a ministerial statement to Holyrood, Forbes set out the Government's resource spending review which will see a boost to health, social security, including child benefits, and environmental policy areas.
Budgets for local government, the police, justice, universities, rural affairs are set to fall by around 8% in real-terms over the next four years, while spending on enterprise, tourism and trade promotion is set to fall even further - by 16% in real terms, over the same period.
READ MORE: Rishi Sunak's oil firm tax break could have insulated millions of homes
It is the first time the Scottish Government has published a multi-year programme since 2011, and child poverty campaigners have welcomed the focus on supporting those on low incomes being prioritised.
Forbes told MSPs that Scotland is facing an “unprecendented cost of living crisis”, adding that Brexit had made the issue worse and that the poorest in society were being hit hardest.
The Scottish Tories blamed the £3.5bn shortfall on “staggering incompetence” from the Scottish Government and called for income tax to be brought into line with the UK.
The spending review, which is not a budget, sets out how the Scottish Government will target funding in certain areas as the country recovers from the Covid-19 pandemic and tackles the climate crisis and inequality.
Forbes told the chamber that rising energy prices and constrained supply chains have had an impact worldwide, but inflation is not “impacting them equally”.
She told MSPs: “The UK currently has the highest inflation of any G7 country - almost twice the rate of France. Brexit has made this problem worse, with increases in food prices, hitting the poorest hardest.
“We are experiencing an unprecedented cost of living crisis. Inflation is at a 40-year high of 9 per cent with households facing considerable hardship.
“We are doing all we can in response, prioritising additional funds to help households in need, but the limits on our fiscal and economic powers limit in turn the support we can offer.”
READ MORE: Scottish Tory MPs fail to speak out against Boris Johnson as resignation calls ramp up
Forbes added that following a reduction of 5.2% from the Scottish budget last year, funding will only grow by 2% in real terms in the next four years.
She said: “It is not inevitable - it is the result of a deliberate choice by the UK Government - as they sit on their hands.
“While the Chancellor has provided welcome, if limited support for households, the chill winds of Tory austerity are blowing when it comes to spending on public services.”
Forbes added that the government will require the public sector to become more efficient with a focus to be on digitalisation, the public sector estate and improving public procurement.
The reforms are “necessary” to allow more investment in battling child poverty, achieving net zero, growing the economy and improving public services, Forbes told MSPs.
Scottish Conservative Shadow Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Economy, Liz Smith MSP claimed that Scotland had been given “record funding” from Westminster this year and said the funding gap was down to “staggering incompetence” from the SNP.
READ MORE: Angus Robertson visits Brussels to strengthen ties with EU
She added: “They must commit to bringing Scottish income tax levels back on a par with the UK, so that Scotland is no longer the highest taxed part of the country.
“They must address the ever-growing skills gap that is stifling our productivity, and they must take an economically devastating independence referendum off the table, to finally prioritise Scotland’s economic growth.”
Forbes fired back: “If we ever needed proof of what the Tories priorities are, on a day when an investigation by Glasgow University confirms that UK Tory austerity is the reason behind stagnating life expectancy across Scotland and the UK - that is the proof that we need of where the Tories will prioritise their spending.”
Peter Kelly, director of the Poverty Alliance welcomed the focus on tackling child poverty, but warned that local councils need to be properly supported to deliver this in practice.
He said: “A lot of those actions are at least partly the responsibility of local councils – things like investing in childcare that’s free at the point of need, in free public transport, in good public services, in social housing, and in our social security system.
"Without proper support for local councils, there is a danger that these actions might not happen – which will have direct consequences for households on the lowest incomes.
“We need to fund the investment we need to meet our poverty targets. The Scottish Budget mostly comes from Westminster, but we also have powers over income tax and local taxation. We hope to hear more detail from the Finance Secretary about how she will use those powers to fund investment in anti-poverty measures.”
READ MORE: Scottish Government allocates £20 million for independence referendum in 2023
He said: “Government’s decisions can cast a much longer shadow than those of a single small firm. For example, shutting down local public sector buildings might save money on paper, but it risks undermining collective efforts to turn town centres around.”
David Phillips, associate director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said that despite extra funding, health services could still struggle in the next few years.
Andrew McRae, the Federation of Small Businesses (FSB) Scotland policy chair, said that the public sector and small businesses are still “reeling” from Covid and now face “mounting overheads” and the challenge of inflation.
Here is our first take on the #spendingreview. Much more analysis to follow today and tomorrow but first thoughts: 🧵
— Fraser of Allander Institute (@Strath_FAI) May 31, 2022
He added: “Underlying these difficult decisions are UK government funding plans that look less generous than when they were set last Autumn as a result of higher inflation. But big increases in social security spending and a relatively poor income tax performance also make the challenges more difficult, and that’s despite the Scottish Government implicitly assuming a further rise in income tax relative to the rest of the UK."
The Fraser of Allander Institute said the Scottish Government “deserves credit” for setting out a multi-year plan despite “significant uncertainty”, but added the impact will be “stark” on the public sector and local government.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel