THE UK Government has been urged to end its “obsession” with nuclear power and focus on renewable energy.
The SNP have said it is “abundantly clear” nuclear will cost more and will send energy bills soaring even further, while people in Scotland “can see clean energy being produced in their own backyards”.
It comes as a written response to a parliamentary question confirms further delays to the UK’s Hinkley Point C nuclear power station, which reports suggest could cost the taxpayer up to £26 billion – opening four years later than scheduled.
MP Alan Brown (pictured), the party’s Shadow Minister for Energy and Climate change, said the delays added “insult to injury” for consumers, after UK Government Business Secretary Kwasi Kwarteng admitted recently the construction of new nuclear plants would initially raise household energy bills.
READ MORE: Scotland cannot allow a handful people to make key decisions on natural assets, experts warn
Based on the contract awarded by the Westminster government to Hinkley Point C, the electricity that will be generated by that existing nuclear station will be priced at £92.50 per megawatt hour, for a 35-year contract, whereas the electricity being generated from offshore wind is currently priced at £39.65 per megawatt hour on a 15-year concession.
This means Hinkley Point C alone could add up to £40 a year to consumer bills, compared to wind power, which could reduce bills by £8 a year.
Brown said: “This latest admission shows the Westminster government’s obsession with nuclear power will do absolutely nothing to help people cope with the spiralling Tory-made cost of living crisis.
“For months we’ve heard endless lectures and bleatings from the Tories on their nuclear obsession, yet every week we’re treated to new reports and estimates of the true cost of prioritising a massive shift towards nuclear.
“The latest reports simply add insult to injury for the consumers whose energy bills have skyrocketed in recent months and who were promised a great reprieve when the UK shifts its reliance to nuclear.
“It’s abundantly clear that nuclear will cost more, is costing more, and will send bills soaring even further – all while many people, particularly in Scotland, can see clean renewable energy being produced in their own backyards.”
The Scottish Greens have also branded the UK Government’s drive towards nuclear as nonsensical.
The party’s climate change spokesperson, Mark Ruskell, said: “Both the Tory Government and Labour Party’s ideological obsession with nuclear power doesn’t make sense either economically or environmentally.
“Nuclear is hugely expensive and leaves a toxic waste legacy for generations. Instead of investing in toxic white elephants, investment should be focused in Scotland’s massive renewable potential.”
Lynn Jamieson, chair of the Scottish Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND), said she rejected the UK Government’s claims nuclear was good for the planet, and insisted we should be transitioning away from it.
She said: “The UK Government’s claims that nuclear is good for the environment ignores the harms of uranium mining, the radioactive waste, the risks of cancers and catastrophic accident – irrationally favouring nuclear industries over cheaper, safer and more quickly available renewables.
READ MORE: Scotland could outlaw destroying unsold goods under new Greens bill
“This reflects their commitment to nuclear weapons over a nuclear free world.
“The nuclear industries are mutually supporting, requiring a critical mass of trained nuclear scientists with career prospects – hence, just as they back nuclear weapons, the UK government back nuclear power.
“More than ever, it is time to build a safer world by transitioning away from nuclear by joining the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW).
“The Scottish CND are grateful that our Scottish Government support a non-nuclear direction of travel and are committed to an independent Scotland signing the TPNW.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel