THE BBC has been criticised after it failed to cover an academic study highlighting the impact of Tory austerity on life expectancy in Scotland.
The report found that austerity measures imposed by the UK Government had an “important and substantial” impact on mortality rates.
Mortality rates throughout the 20th century fell year on year, except in times of war or pandemic, but began to stagnate around 2012, with the poorest being hit hardest.
Conducted by Glasgow University and the Glasgow Centre for Population Health using already available studies, the findings suggested cuts in the wake of the 2008 financial crash significantly contributed to the stagnation.
READ MORE: Anas Sarwar branded 'austerity apologist' after defending Tory public service funding
Gerry McCartney, the report’s lead author and a professor of wellbeing economy at Glasgow, said that “any further austerity policies that squeeze public spending will have disastrous long-term impacts on population health”.
Dr David Walsh, the report’s co-author, said: “The evidence shows [the stagnation in mortality rates] are principally the result of UK Government austerity policies.”
As reported in The National, Walsh had told a Holyrood committee days before the report was published: “You can trace the effects of austerity through well-understood pathways to tragically early death.”
After its publication, the study was covered by various media outlets including The National, STV, The Times, The Independent, and the news agency PA.
%image('13841293', type="article-full", alt="Nicola Sturgeon addressed the report into the effects on austerity at FMQs on Wednesday")
The study was also addressed by Nicola Sturgeon during First Minister’s Questions on Wednesday. She told MSPs: “I think it’s appalling and it displays and gives evidence for what I think many of us have suspected is the case over some time now.
“What the researchers at the Glasgow Centre for Population Health found, and I’m quoting here, is ‘austerity is highly likely to be the most substantial causal contributor to the stalled mortality trends seen in Scotland and across the UK’. So, it’s down to Tory austerity.”
However, the BBC did not cover the report.
Erik Geddes, the head of broadcast for the SNP, commented on the inconsistency on Twitter.
Life expectancy rates in Scotland is an issue @BBCScotlandNews has frequently reported on in recent years.
— Erik Geddes (@erikgeddes) May 31, 2022
Would be v odd if they didn’t do so today - off the back of an academic study by @uofglasgow showing UK gov cuts are primarily to blame for this. pic.twitter.com/eg0xrfX4lJ
He wrote: “Life expectancy rates in Scotland is an issue @BBCScotlandNews has frequently reported on in recent years.
“Would be v odd if they didn’t do so today – off the back of an academic study by @uofglasgow showing UK Gov cuts are primarily to blame for this.”
An SNP source further told The National that “some editorial decisions by the BBC just don’t make sense”.
They added: “Audiences deserve consistency and even-handedness on issues like the impact of Westminster control on life expectancy in Scotland.”
It comes after the BBC repeatedly refused to correct errors across multiple articles on its website which wrongly suggest the UK Government is not set to legalise genetic modification involving the transplanting of genes from one organism to another.
Responding to the report, a UK Government spokesperson said: “The new health and care levy will raise around £12 billion a year across the UK, with £1.1bn going to support the Scottish Government to further invest in health services by 2024, this is on top of their £41bn annual block grant.
“Tackling health disparities is a priority for the Government, and we will work with the Scottish Government and the powers they have, to focus on the people and places who face the worst health outcomes.”
The BBC was approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel