THE UK Government has caved to pressure from the oil and gas industry and removed a block on the development of a gas field in “British” waters.
Business Secretary Kwasi Kwarteng announced that the Jackdaw gas field had been given “final regulatory approval”, reversing a decision made ahead of COP26.
The top Tory added: “We're turbocharging renewables and nuclear, but we are also realistic about our energy needs now.
“Let's source more of the gas we need from British waters to protect energy security.”
Jackdaw gas field - originally licensed in 1970 - has today received final regulatory approval.
— Kwasi Kwarteng (@KwasiKwarteng) June 1, 2022
We're turbocharging renewables and nuclear, but we are also realistic about our energy needs now.
Let's source more of the gas we need from British waters to protect energy security.
The Jackdaw field is around 250km east of Aberdeen. It is part of the Shearwater hub, meaning that much of the infrastructure is already in place. But last year, the UK Government declined permission to develop it.
In early May, Shell, which is developing the field through its affiliate BG International, publicly pressured the UK Government to reverse this decision.
The U-turn on approval is unlikely to help gas supply in the UK – which is already experiencing a surplus and low wholesale prices. At one point in late May, the “spot price” of gas in the UK was at the lowest level for 18 months and cheaper than before energy prices started spiralling, according to thisismoney.co.uk.
Greenpeace said that the approval “could be unlawful” and said it will consider taking legal action.
Ami McCarthy, political campaigner for Greenpeace UK, said: “Approving Jackdaw is a desperate and destructive decision from Boris Johnson’s government, and proves there’s no long-term plan.
“They could immediately shave billions off bills, get a grip on UK energy demand, create thousands of jobs, boost our economy, tackle the climate crisis and avoid future crises – if they just upgrade homes to be warmer and greener, and invest in clean and cheap renewable power.
“But instead, once again, they’re handing out lucrative permits to the likes of Shell for a project that won’t start producing gas for years, that won’t lower our bills, but will create massive emissions causing deadly flooding and wildfires, and mass migration from people fleeing the climate crisis.
“This government’s shown no regard for these emissions, or Jackdaw’s ultimate climate impact. We think that’s unlawful, we’re looking at legal action to stop Jackdaw, and fight this every step of the way.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel