WHAT do you do if you make a mistake? Apologise? Try to make amends?
What do you do if you make a mistake and you’re Murdo Fraser? Refuse to acknowledge it seems to be the answer to that.
The Conservative MSP tweeted gleefully about what he called a “hugely significant” finding from the Institute for Fiscal Studies – only to be corrected by the very expert he was quoting.
READ MORE: Indy debate will go away once Scots get 'fed up of it', Murdo Fraser suggests
Sharing a tweet from IFS associate director David Phillips, Fraser wrote: “This is a hugely significant finding from @TheIFS – the income tax rises imposed by SNP/Greens have actually REDUCED the amount of money available for @scotgov to spend, due to relatively poorer economic growth in Scotland.”
Unfortunately for Fraser, it wasn’t long before Phillips came along.
The expert pointed out that the tax rises the Tory MSP had complained about had “almost certainly” increased the amount of money the Scottish Government had to spend, not “REDUCED” it.
I should correct this misunderstanding. We are not saying the tax rises have reduced revenue.
— David Phillips (@fiscalphillips) May 28, 2022
The tax rises almost certainly have raised revenue.
In their absence the slow employment and earnings growth (mostly not due to tax policy) would have seen revenues fall even further. https://t.co/1c7tPgNaMO
Phillips wrote: “I should correct this misunderstanding. We are not saying the tax rises have reduced revenue.
“The tax rises almost certainly have raised revenue.
“In their absence the slow employment and earnings growth (mostly not due to tax policy) would have seen revenues fall even further.”
So what are the facts of the matter? It’s complicated, but you might expect an MSP who has served as the Scottish Tories’ finance spokesperson to have a better grasp of such things.
Fortunately, the Jouker spent a wee while working the tills at the souvenir shop at M&D’s, so should have a stronger grasp of finance than Fraser.
READ MORE: Tory MSP jets off to Seville for Rangers final while parliament is sitting
Now, the full IFS report states: “Relatively slow growth in the income tax base in Scotland relative to the rest of the UK is an increasing drain on the Scottish Government’s budget.”
This relates to how income tax is devolved. The UK Government deducts from the Scottish block grant an amount equal to what should be raised if the Scottish Government keeps the same income tax policy as the rest of the UK and income tax receipts per head grow at the same rate.
However, policy changes may mean that the Scottish budget could be larger or smaller than it would have been before income tax was devolved.
Recently, Scotland’s tax base has seen slower growth compared to the rest of the UK – for reasons largely outwith the Scottish Government’s control, such as a more rapidly ageing population.
The IFS says that thanks to the devolution of income tax giving the Scottish Government an “important” new lever, there are “relatively straightforward” ways to raise funds.
Phillips added on Twitter: “We've explained in previous analysis that it’s highly unlikely the tax rate change caused the fall in the tax base which has driven the relative fall in tax revenues.”
Hopefully that’s clear. It obviously wasn’t to Fraser.
Economist and Tax Justice Network chief Alex Cobham has asked the Tory MSP to correct his post.
He wrote: “I hope you can correct your widely shared tweet, murdo_fraser, now the IFS expert you cite has explicitly stated that the reverse is true.
“The tax debate is too important (eg for reaching the child poverty target) to allow false impressions to take hold.”
I hope you can correct your widely shared tweet, @murdo_fraser, now the IFS expert you cite has explicitly stated that the reverse is true. The tax debate is too important (eg for reaching the child poverty target) to allow false impressions to take hold https://t.co/ejyenaZzws https://t.co/dPhywD1u3F
— Alex Cobham (@alexcobham) May 29, 2022
No response yet. But a Tory wouldn’t just leave a lie on the internet, would they?
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel