ONE of Vote Leave’s founders has admitted that the UK should have stayed in the single market after Brexit in order to “save a lot of trouble”.
Lord Daniel Hannan, who served as a Tory MEP from 2009 to 2018 and played a prominent role in the Brexit campaign, made the dramatic claim in an article for The Telegraph.
He wrote: "We should have stayed in the single market, but rejoining it now would be madness.
"Leaving the market was an upheaval, but it was the chance to deregulate. Instead, ministers are retaining rules we once fought to repeal."
The Board of Trade adviser’s comments come after backbench Tory MP Tobias Ellwood sparked a fierce row in the Conservative Party with an article suggesting the UK rejoin the EU’s single market.
In his column, Hannan claims he wanted a Swiss-style deal with the EU in which the country has partial access to its single market in exchange for a financial contribution.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson told to step down 'immediately' by Conservative donor named MR TORY
Despite this he says “positions hardened” on the Remain and Leave sides during the run-up to the referendum – making this argument more difficult.
On the day of the results, Hannan claims he was still anticipating a Swiss-style agreement – but as the process of leaving the EU became more complicated, realised the “moderate Brexit” had vanished from the agenda.
Hannan’s main issue with the ultimate decision to leave the single market appears to be that the Tory government has not utilised its “freedom” sufficiently.
“Having chosen total freedom over short-term convenience, we have made only the most paltry, milk-and-water attempts to exercise that freedom,” he claims. “Our trade policy remains barely less mercantilist than the EU’s – even our talks with Australia and New Zealand were prejudiced by agrarian protectionism.”
He goes on: “Again and again, ministers have shied away from choices that risk short-term criticism.
“Brexit could have created a freer, more prosperous and more global Britain. Instead, we are pursuing semi-socialist economic policies which poll well in the short term, but which condemn us to long-term poverty.”
Prominent EU law expert Jessica Simor QC suggested Hannan’s admission is a sign that the “tide is turning” – and told top Brexiteers to “take note”.
Lord Hannan agrees with @Tobias_Ellwood. Maybe @DavidGHFrost and others might take note. The tide is turning. https://t.co/E66dpyiprt
— Jessica Simor QC (@JMPSimor) June 5, 2022
“When Lord Hannan of Kingsclere, a founder member of Vote Leave and major ERG headbanger, is writing positively about EU trade membership, you know something's changed,” another commenter added.
After Leave won the Brexit referendum, the SNP proposed to ensure Scotland could continue to access the single market. The party was ignored by the UK Government – while fellow Remain-voting Northern Ireland’s deal with the EU meant the province would get “the best of both worlds” according to Michael Gove.
Now, Northern Ireland’s economy is outperforming the rest of the UK’s. According to a recent report from the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, this is “partly an outcome of the Northern Irish Protocol … and trade and investment conditions as part of the EU’s single market and customs union”.
Michael Russell, who served as the Scottish Government's constitution secretary during the Brexit process, was frustrated with Hannan's comments.
"As [the Scottish Government] argued consistently up to and beyond May’s Lancaster House speech," he recalled. "But May was too scared of extremist Tories - like Hannan- to accept the compromise and therefore rejected the obvious ... comtinuing [sic] single market relationship."
READ MORE: Grant Shapps downplays Jubilee booing for Boris Johnson: 'There were also people cheering'
The SNP's Europe spokesperson Dr Philippa Whitford MP added: "Hannan's comments simply highlight the fact that there was no 'vision' of Brexit, with the Leave campaign deliberately avoiding any possible discussion of what leaving the EU would actually mean - beyond the nonsense of "Brexit means Brexit!"
“The SNP repeatedly called for the Tory government to retain membership of the Single Market, including in the 2016 report by the Scottish Government: Scotland's Place in Europe. They ignored us, as ever, and dragged us out of the EU, and the world's biggest trading bloc, against our will.
“Scottish Government modelling shows that Scotland is disproportionately impacted by Brexit, with Scotland’s GDP set to be 6% lower – or £9 billion worse – by 2030."
She went on to say that independence would "put Scotland's future in Scotland's hands" and allow the country to work collaboratively on the international stage.
Meanwhile Brexit is hammering the rest of the economy “at the worst possible time”, according to the SNP.
A report released last week by the Food and Drink Federation revealed that exports to the EU were down 17.3% in the first quarter of 2022, accounting for more than £600 million lost.
Salmon was hit particularly hard with a drop of 25%.
A 10.7% increase in exports to the rest of the world did not make up for the losses of EU trade post-Brexit.
"The only way for Scotland to escape the long-term damage of Brexit is to become an independent country and re-join the EU and the biggest single trading bloc – one which is seven times bigger than the UK market,” said the SNP shadow secretary for environment Deidre Brock.
How has Brexit affected your Scottish business?
Has Brexit had an impact on your Scottish business? Whether you work in hospitality, travel, or any other sector we would love to hear from you. We already know leaving the EU has meant empty shop shelves, delays in orders and price rises for Scots businesses. Now we want to hear from owners themselves to find out what Brexit has done to our firms.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel