NADINE Dorries has admitted that the Tory government’s pandemic preparedness was “found wanting and inadequate” while attempting to launch an attack on rebels opposed to Boris Johnson’s leadership.
The Culture Secretary hit out at “duplicitous” Jeremy Hunt, the former health secretary and challenger to Johnson during the 2019 leadership election, who is now planning to vote against the Prime Minister in the no-confidence ballot.
Hunt, one of the top picks to run for the leadership should Johnson be ousted by his colleagues, had said he’d be “voting for change”.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson begs MPs for support in desperate three-page letter as anti-corruption tsar quits
Johnson loyalist Dorries jumped at the chance to call out the former minister – and in the process admitted that the Government hadn’t been prepared for Covid to hit.
The UK Government has long defended its handling of the pandemic, though many experts argued ministers were too slow to act in 2020.
Dorries claimed Hunt had told her he expected the Government to collapse on the back of Brexit “and you would swoop in”.
“If you had been leader you’d have handed the keys of No 10 to [Jeremy)] Corbyn," she told the backbencher.
“You’ve been wrong about almost everything, you are wrong again now.”
She said that while she served as health minister Hunt, whose wife is Chinese, had recommended following that country’s example in dealing with the Covid-19 pandemic, with cases “removed from their homes and placed into isolation hotels for two weeks”.
Claiming Hunt’s handling of the pandemic would “have been a disaster”, Dorries told the MP: “Your pandemic preparation during six years as health secretary was found wanting and inadequate. Your duplicity right now in destabilising the party and country to serve your own personal ambition, more so.”
The minister’s admission was quickly noted by opposition politicians.
“This is a revealing admission and damning indictment of the Conservatives’ pandemic preparedness,” responded Labour’s shadow health secretary Wes Streeting.
“They’re not fit to govern.”
“We now have Tory cabinet ministers stating on the record how un-prepared the Government was for the pandemic,” added his Labour colleague Feryal Clark.
“Not sure ‘our government didn’t properly prepare for the pandemic’ is a great tactic but here we are!” said journalist Richard Chambers.
The BBC's political editor, Chris Mason, suggested Dorries's intervention had made MPs angrier.
"I'm hearing the thread below from the Culture Secretary about Jeremy Hunt has incensed some MPs and is tempting some to vote against the Prime Minister -- because they feel it comes with his endorsement," he explained.
"Others insisting it's not changing any minds, just angering those already angry a bit more."
On Monday morning, dozens of Conservative MPs and ministers issued public declarations of support for Johnson ahead of the vote on the future of his leadership.
READ MORE: Will Boris Johnson survive no-confidence vote? Have your say in our POLL
In what appeared to be a co-ordinated show of support, Cabinet ministers – including potential leadership contenders Liz Truss, Rishi Sunak and Ben Wallace – declared their backing for Mr Johnson on social media.
Backbench Tories also joined in, with some tweeting a document drawn up by the Prime Minister’s allies showing his achievements and setting out reasons to keep him in place.
By mid-morning the public declarations of support had eclipsed the 54 MPs required to trigger the confidence vote.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel