SCOTS left without power for days following Storm Arwen were provided an “unacceptable service” by electricity networks, industry watchdog Ofgem has ruled.
Winds of 100mph caused widespread disruption, uprooted trees and damaged power lines, cutting power to nearly one million homes in Scotland and northern England from November 26.
Outages lasted for more than 10 days in some areas and customers complained of poor communication from their suppliers about when they would be reconnected.
Ofgem has carried out an independent review of the industry, focusing on whether the power outages could have been prevented, if correct and timely information was given to customers affected, whether power was restored quickly enough, and how customers were supported after the storm, including compensation payments.
It found staff at distribution network operators (DNOs) worked hard in challenging conditions, but concluded that thousands of customers were provided with an “unacceptable service”.
Ofgem chief executive Jonathan Brearley said: “Distribution network companies faced challenging conditions in the aftermath of Storm Arwen, and I pay tribute to the many colleagues in those companies who supported customers and worked to get them back on power as quickly as possible.
“However, it was unacceptable that nearly 4,000 homes in parts of England and Scotland were off power for over a week, often without accurate information as to when power would be restored.
“Network companies need to do better, not just to prevent power disruptions, but to ensure that, when power is off, they work smarter to get people back on power quicker, and keep customers informed with accurate and timely information. This is the very least customers should be able to expect.
“The frequency of extreme weather events is only set to increase so it is really important that industry, and those involved more widely, learn from Storm Arwen to better respond in future.”
The Ofgem review found:
- Some affected customers remained off power for an unacceptable amount of time, received poor communication from their network operator and compensation payments took too long.
- Plans in place to deal with the storm were not sufficient to deal with the scale of the damage.
- Northern Powergrid did not directly contact vulnerable customers enrolled on its Priority Services Register prior to Storm Arwen, which should have been carried out as part of its winter preparedness campaign.
- The same firm accepted the performance of its call centre fell below the standards it should have been able to meet during a severe storm, potentially breaching its licence.
- Limited remote monitoring stopped firms from understanding the full scale and complexity of faults.
- There was some correlation between the age of electricity poles and how badly damaged they were in the storm, although this needed further examination.
Three firms – Northern Powergrid, Scottish and Southern Electricity Networks and Electricity North West – paid nearly £30 million in direct compensation to affected customers after the storms and will now pay a further £10.3m in voluntary redress payments to the affected communities.
Ofgem has recommended firms should submit their winter plans to the regulator so it is sure they are prepared.
They should also stress-test their websites and call centres to ensure adequate capacity during severe weather events.
Firms should also develop systems to speed up mass compensation payments.
Business and Energy Secretary Kwasi Kwarteng said: “Storm Arwen was one of the most extreme weather events in decades, and I’m grateful to all those engineers, armed forces personnel and volunteers who worked night and day to get people reconnected to power.
“However, it’s clear that thousands of customers were badly let down by electricity network companies, which is why I launched this review to identify and address any failings.
“This action plan will ensure better preparedness for future storms, boosting the security of our electricity system and protecting families.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel