AN SNP MP has skewered the Rwandan asylum seekers scheme as a Government attempt to “virtue signal” to a “heartless and xenophobic” group of Tory backbenchers.
Speaking on Politics Live, Stephen Flynn, MP for Aberdeen South, was discussing the details of the UK Government’s plan to send asylum seekers who the UK Government has deemed to have entered the country unlawfully to Rwanda for processing.
Flynn described the scheme as “disgusting” and that the legal basis underpinning it was “doubtful”.
READ MORE: Brexit is making cancer treatment 'more challenging', says Nicola Sturgeon
He said: “For me, it’s emblematic of a UK Government which is intent on virtue signalling to what I believe is a heartless and xenophobic minority within the Tory backbenches.”
Flynn’s comments prompted an audible laugh from fellow panelist and economist Miatta Fahnbulleh.
Flynn then clashed with Peter Bone after the Tory MP said that he didn’t “understand the situation”.
Flynn cut across Bone saying: “Don’t condescend me like that. How do I not know the situation?”
Bone accused Flynn of not understanding how evil human traffickers are before the SNP MP insisted that their disagreement was more to do with how to challenge them.
Bone said: “The way to combat that is to create safe and legal routes for some of the most vulnerable people on the planet, to get them to safety – not to ship them off to Rwanda.
“A country which has questionable Human Rights, if you are gay, lesbian or transgender then you are going to be punished in that country. It is simply not acceptable. It’s not in my name”
The SNP then took issue with Bone’s previous references to the will of Parliament in the debate as the Tory MP said that it should be up to the Commons to decide how the UK deals with migrants, not the courts.
Bone said: “You keep referencing Parliament, it’s your party, not my party and not my country, that supports this.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel