THE Scottish Secretary has seemingly undermined his own Conservative allies’ claims that Douglas Ross has been “completely consistent” on the Prime Minister’s position.
The Scottish Tory leader was accused of “flip-flopping” after he called for Boris Johnson to resign, before withdrawing his letter of no confidence, before supporting a bid to oust the Prime Minister.
His chief whip, Stephen Kerr MSP, told the BBC that Ross had been “completely consistent with the principle”.
However, Alister Jack has now told ITV’s Representing Border that the Scottish Tory leader has often changed his mind.
“I’ve been successful in persuading Douglas Ross to change his mind a few times, as we’ve seen,” Jack laughed.
“We are where we are, Douglas has changed his position again and that’s absolutely his choice. I respect his right to do that.”
SNP minister Clare Haughey said the interview was "very telling". She added: "Just leaves one question for Douglas Ross to answer – who is really leading the Scottish Tories?"
The Scottish Secretary, who is one of only two MPs from north of the Border who has not called for Johnson to lose his position after a string of scandals and criminal behaviour, also doubled down on his support for his boss in London.
“My own view is that the right person to lead the United Kingdom Government is Boris Johnson and he has my whole-hearted support,” Jack said.
“I think Boris Johnson should remain prime minister as long as he keeps winning elections, and as long as he wants to be the leader of the party, he should be the leader of the party.”
'Douglas has changed his position again'
— Representing Border (@ITVBorderRB) June 9, 2022
Alister Jack is asked about Douglas Ross's vote of no confidence in the Prime Minister.
Scottish Secretary 'respects' Mr Ross's 'right to do that'.
But own view is Boris Johnson should remain PM 'as long as he keeps winning elections' pic.twitter.com/hgZp0XH8KH
Johnson is considered to be on his last legs by many Westminster watchers, after 41% of his MPs said they had no confidence in his leadership in a vote earlier in the week.
The Tory leader claimed a “decisive” victory in Monday's ballot, which saw 148 MPs vote for his removal against 211 for him to stay.
Speaking at Prime Minister’s Questions, SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford said: "When I’ve called on this Prime Minister to resign, I’ve always been met by a wall of noise from the Tory benches. I always thought they were trying to shout me down. But, all this time, it turns out that 41% of them have actually been cheering me on."
The SNP MP said the "numbers don't lie", adding that two-thirds of MPs in the Commons don’t support the Prime Minister and that 97% of Scottish MPs “want the Minister for the Union out the door”.
He continued: "We now have a lame duck Prime Minister presiding over a divided party in a disunited kingdom. So how does the Prime Minister expect to continue when even the Unionist leaders in Scotland won’t back him?"
SNP Depute Leader Keith Brown added: “These revelations showing Alister Jack pulling the strings behind Douglas Ross is another hammer blow to his authority in an already disastrous week for the Tories.
“People elect politicians to make tough decisions, and leaders to lead. It seems Douglas Ross is incapable on both counts.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel