THERE was “nothing choreographed” about the release of a key document in relation to the contract for two delayed and over-budget ferries, a senior Transport Scotland official has claimed.

The vessels – the Glen Sannox and the unnamed 802 – are due to be delivered next year, five years later than planned, and costing more than double the initial predictions, at around £250 million.

The ships are currently being built at the Ferguson Marine shipyard in Port Glasgow, which was taken under government ownership in 2019.

A report from Audit Scotland earlier this year found there had been concerns raised by ferry procurer Caledonian Maritime Assets Limited (CMAL) about the lack of a full refund guarantee from Ferguson Marine as part of the contract – which would act to shield public money if there were problems with the construction. The report also found there was “insufficient documentary evidence” detailing why the contract was signed regardless.

READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon hits out at former ferry boss's 'lie' accusations at FMQs

One document, released by the Scottish Government last month, showed a previously unseen email trail where then-transport minister Derek Mackay approved the contract.

The document was given to the Scottish Government just hours before the Scottish Tories called a debate on ferries.

But a senior Transport Scotland official has said there was nothing nefarious in the timing of the release, contrary to the accusations of opposition politicians.

Speaking at the Public Audit Committee, director of maritime, freight and canals at Transport Scotland, Frances Pacitti, said: “I was not asked or instructed by anyone to continue to look for the document but, accepting the interest that there is in it, and understanding our obligations to try and be as transparent as we can, we did a further search in advance of preparation for this committee.”

“This time, engaging with IT colleagues, there is some new software which allows for forensic searches – that’s not something that’s typically done because of the resource intensity of it – and that identified the submission of October 9 [2015] which you have.”

When the committee convener told Pacitti that a debate on the issue would be held in Holyrood the same day the document was released, she said: “There was nothing choreographed around that – as soon as we found it, we alerted ministers to it and put it in the public domain at the earliest opportunity.”

Meanwhile, the Scottish Government’s director of economic development, Colin Cook, refused to say if the Scottish Government would scrap the vessels.

When questioned by Tory MSP Craig Hoy, Cook said: “We’re determined to deliver these vessels, we understand that they’re vital for communities and that will be our focus.”

“[The question] unfortunately, is trying to draw me into the realms of speculation where decisions on these things are taken by ministers, and I don’t think I’m going to be able to add anything to it.

“I know that our team is monitoring the progress of the vessels, we’re working very closely with Fergusons.

“I know that we are responsible as accountable officers within the organisation for applying the right tests and making the right recommendations for ministers, and that is what we’ll continue to do.”