JUSTICE Secretary Keith Brown has told how he was “petrified” during the Battle of Two Sisters in the Falklands War 40 years ago today.
Brown, who is also the Scottish Government’s Veterans Minister, said he joined the Royal Marines in 1980 as a result of the employment situation at the time and as a way to get fit.
In 1982, he was shipped out to the Falkland Islands with 45 Commando. The first hint Brown had that something could be afoot was when his leave was cancelled.
He added: “It came pretty much out of the blue to me and most people.”
But it was not until the boat carrying Brown and his comrades left Ascension Island, where it had arrived from Portsmouth, that the threat of war with Argentina seemed to be a realistic prospect.
“I don’t think it was until we left Ascension Island that people felt there was a good chance this could actually happen,” he said.
Brown and the rest of 45 Commando, landed on East Falkland under small arms fire, he said. “From memory, I thought there would be a lot more fire than that,” he said. “I think what quickly overtook that was we were led to believe we were going to have total air superiority, so we started to wonder why we were getting constant air raids.
“The air raids were much more of a thing than the small arms fire – it was a bit distant, you could hear it.”
The troops of 45 Commando found themselves involved in one of three battles fought on the night of June 11 into the next morning.
The battles resulted in the capture of the high points around Port Stanley, prompting the subsequent surrender of Argentine forces on the island. When I was in the attack on Two Sisters, I was petrified,” Brown said. “I did my job, but I was petrified. There were other guys that had seen it before who were as calm as you could imagine.”
When asked, some 40 years on from the war, if he felt the war was justified, Brown was unequivocal – describing the regime of Argentine president Leopoldo Galtieri as a “fascist dictatorship”.
“The bottom line really comes down to how the people who live there want to live their lives,” he said. “I think self-determination is quite an important principle.
“I do think it was important to protect that principle – they did not want to be ruled by Argentina, the way they were treated when the Argentinians came across showed it was not going to be a bright future for them as well, so I do think it was justified.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel