A BILL that would ease regulations around gene editing in the food sector should not “force products on Scotland”, a minister has said.
The Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Bill was introduced earlier this month at Westminster and would create a separate regulatory category for "precision bred" organisms – meaning traits within a plant or animal can be changed much more quickly than traditional selective breeding.
The UK Government defines the type of genetic modification it will be legalising as mirroring natural processes. However, the bill contains multiple caveats that undermine this definition, meaning a wide range of genetic modification tools and practices will be legalised.
After an EU ruling in 2018, genetic editing is regulated in the same stringent way as GM organisms, a situation the UK Government is set on changing in England.
READ MORE: Fresh leadership crisis for Boris Johnson as Welsh Tories look to split off
In a letter to Environment Secretary George Eustice and Scottish Secretary Alister Jack, Scottish Government environment minister Mairi McAllan said Scotland would not make the same changes as England if the bill passed.
McAllan also took issue with engagement between the UK and Scottish governments in the lead-up to the bill being introduced, and claimed changes in regulation in England would have an impact on the rest of the devolved administrations.
Under the Internal Market Act 2020, items that meet regulatory standards in one part of the country must be allowed to be sold elsewhere in the UK.
Critics of the Act, including the Scottish Government and the SNP group at Westminster, described it as a “power grab” before it was passed.
An impact assessment published alongside the new bill said: “Whilst this legislative change will only take effect in England, the mutual recognition element of the United Kingdom Internal Market (UKIM) Act means that products entering the market in England would also be marketable in both Scotland and Wales.
“Thus, there would be no tangible barrier to precision-bred organisms entering the market across Great Britain.”
McAllan wrote: “Such an outcome is unacceptable.
“The Scottish Government remains wholly opposed to the imposition of the Internal Market Act, and will not accept any constraint on the exercise of its devolved powers to set standards within devolved policy areas.”
McAllan urged ministers to ensure Scotland is not impacted by the legislation, saying: “If the UK Government is determined to press ahead with this legislation, it must take steps to ensure that its revisions to the definition of a GMO (genetically modified organism) do not force products on Scotland which do not meet standards here without the consent of the Scottish Parliament.”
She also raised concerns about the impact of the bill on Scotland’s food exports to the EU.
“As your impact assessment for the Genetic Technologies (Precision Breeding) Bill acknowledges, removing gene-edited products from England’s GM regulatory regime would mean divergence from the EU approach and as such could have implications for compliance costs and future trade,” she wrote.
“The impact assessment also raises the prospect that new trade barriers could come in the form of checks and certification requirements on UK food exports entering the EU’s single market.
“It states that this would not only affect products exported to the EU which contain precision-bred plant material, but also those in the same product categories which do not.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel