PRESIDING Officer Alison Johnstone cancelled a statement on independence from the Constitution Secretary as she criticised the Government for speaking to the media about a new paper on the issue before Parliament.
It was widely reported on Monday that the Scottish Government would publish the first in a series of papers making the case for an independent Scotland on Tuesday.
As expected, Nicola Sturgeon held a press conference with Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie to answer questions on Tuesday morning at the paper's launch.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson responds to new indyref2 campaign launch
But Johnstone made her feelings well-known in Holyrood on Tuesday afternoon, saying it was "unacceptable" MSPs had not heard about the planned release of the document first.
Instead of allowing Angus Robertson to make a statement on the "scene-setter" for independence, she simply skipped straight to questions, meaning Tory leader Douglas Ross had the first say in the chamber.
Johnstone said: "Yesterday, significant news that should’ve been announced in this chamber as a matter of courtesy and respect to the Parliament was reported by national media.
"Long-established good practice guidance on announcements by the Scottish Government states that announcements by Government on matters of importance should not enter the public domain before or without being communicated to the Parliament where the subject matter relates to matters on which members of the public would have a clear interest.
"It is my role to represent this Parliament’s interests and in doing so I take account of all members' interests equally.
"The Government is in no doubt that I do not regard this as acceptable and in these circumstances the Parliament’s time is used best by moving straight to questions and I call Douglas Ross."
SNP MSP George Adam told the i newspaper that the document had not been announced in the Scottish Parliament as it contained "no significant policy commitments".
Johnstone – who was elected as a Green MSP – said there was a “strong expectation” that announcements of “public interest” are made to parliament first.
Meanwhile, Scottish Tory leader Ross said the push for another vote was the “wrong priority at the worst possible time”.
“The people of Scotland want the focus to be on the huge challenges facing us,” he said.
“We want the focus of the Scottish Government to be on creating better jobs and opportunities, we want the focus to be on improving public services.
“Instead, this SNP government just offers more distraction, more disruption and division.”
Responding to Ross, as well as to Labour and the LibDems, Robertson said: “Now we have all of the opposition parties lining up in their agreement of democracy denial.
“We will be on different sides of the argument about Scotland’s future, but please don’t come here to the chamber and say the people of Scotland can’t have their say when they voted in an election that they should be allowed to do just that.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel