PROTESTERS gathered to voice their fury at the Government’s policy to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda in the hours before the first flight to the country is set to take off.
A small crowd gathered in Glasgow’s George Square on Tuesday evening in protest over the policy, which will be interrogated in court next month to determine its legality.
Among them was Kurdish asylum seeker Brwa Mahmood, who arrived in Britain four months ago.
Protesters are in George Square to protest the Tories' vile Rwanda plan. Scotland is making its views on this government clear! 📢✊ pic.twitter.com/H8upB9VIpE
— The National (@ScotNational) June 14, 2022
The 30-year-old journalist fled danger in Iraq with his wife and two-year-old daughter.
READ MORE: Protesters block vans taking migrants to airport for Rwanda flight
He told The National: “I am here to apply for asylum here. To support people like me, I have come here today.
“I came here to save my life, my wife and my daughter’s life.”
He said he was “not very happy” with the asylum process, which has seen his application delayed because the Home Office deemed his ID photograph – which included his daughter – as unacceptable.
Mohammad Asif, the founder of the Afghan Human Rights Foundation and himself a refugee, told the crowd the UK Government had “destroyed” his home countries and others in the Middle East, adding: “This is our home and we have to stand.”
He noted the disparity in the treatment of asylum seekers from Ukraine versus that of those from the Middle East and Africa.
Britons are being offered a cash incentive to take in those fleeing the war in Eastern Europe and Boris Johnson has pledged Ukrainians will not be sent to Rwanda.
Asif said this disparity was because of racism and said that asylum seekers were “blamed for every ill in this country”.
Asylum seekers will only be sent to Rwanda if they have entered the UK “illegally”, such as crossing the English Channel by boat.
But Asif said there were too few legal routes and urged the government to open safe passages to avoid people making the perilous journey from the French coast.
Alison Phipps, a prominent refugee activist and professor of languages at Glasgow University, told protesters her daughter – an asylum seeker – had been illegally deported and she was only reunited after a difficult campaign against the Home Office.
Phipps said: “This is about the mass transportation by this country to another country. Everyone engaged in this is diminished in their humanity.”
She slammed the UK’s “shabby, grubby trade in human beings”, adding: “Everyone engaged in this is diminished in their humanity.”
READ MORE: Syrian man facing deportation to Rwanda to have case heard in Scottish courts
Will, 24, a care worker, said: “What is being protested against represents the cowardice of the nation, of the government, specifically.
“It’s a deeply immoral attempt to wash our hands of responsibility for the people who are coming here seeking help.”
The first flight – thought to be carrying six people – will take off on Tuesday evening.
A Privilege Style airline Boeing 767 is thought to be setting off from the Boscombe Down military air base in England.
Johnson spent much of the day prior to the flight attacking lawyers representing asylum seekers, accusing them of attempting to undermine the government.
The Bar Council and Law Society of England and Wales condemned the Prime Minister’s comments, calling them “misleading and dangerous”.
A joint statement from the organisations noted such lawers were “simply doing their jobs” by representing clients entitled to legal counsel.
Those sent to Rwanda will have no recourse to return to the UK and can only settle in the East African country or be sent back to their home countries.
There is the possibility the Govrenment may be forced to walk back the policy if it is defeated on human rights grounds in the courts and in this instance the Home Secretary ha committed to bringing those sent away back to Britain.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel