DOUGLAS Ross has said he will boycott an independence referendum that is held without consent from Westminster.
The Scottish Tory leader was being interviewed by Channel 4 when he insisted that he would have “nothing to do with” a “wildcat referendum” and that he would urge people to boycott it.
Ross said: “If Nicola Sturgeon were to be so reckless and irresponsible to go ahead with an illegal wildcat referendum then I wouldn’t support it and I would urge people to boycott it.”
I asked Douglas Ross if he was the first politician in history who didn’t want to hold a vote he thought he would win. @Douglas4Moray says he’d boycott #indyref2 held against the will of the UK Government: pic.twitter.com/RXamTff2bx
— Ciaran Jenkins (@C4Ciaran) June 14, 2022
His comments come after Nicola Sturgeon published the first paper in her vision for an independent Scotland and confirmed the launch of a new Yes campaign in preparation for a vote she intends to hold before the end of next year.
Sturgeon has also confirmed that a referendum will be held with or without a section 30 order.
When asked if he thought a pro-union campaign would win in an upcoming referendum, Ross said that based on current polling data, it would.
This prompted a tongue-in-cheek response from the interviewer as he joked that Ross was the “first politician in history that doesn’t want to hold a vote that you think you’d win”.
READ MORE: Inside the launch of Nicola Sturgeon's first indyref2 white paper: What it was like at Bute House
Ross was later probed on the SNP’s democratic mandate to hold another independence referendum after he said the people of Scotland were more interested in issues other than indyref2.
The interviewer said: “Not, presumably, the people who continue to vote for the SNP in large numbers when they keep winning elections and you keep losing.”
The exchange prompted a fierce response on Twitter, with one user saying: “its because we want to address unemployment, education, etc and we know we can do a better job for ourselves than the current situation of asking Wastemonster if we "can have some more please?" #indyref2 YES!”
its because we want to address unemployment, education, etc and we know we can do a better job for ourselves than the current situation of asking Wastemonster if we "can have some more please?" #indyref2 YES!
— DJ Haggis (@dj_haggis) June 14, 2022
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel