IAN Blackford insisted Scotland is "big enough, rich enough and strong enough" to become an independent nation at Prime Minister's Questions as Boris Johnson failed to answer why it couldn't stand on its own two feet.
The SNP Westminster leader spoke about a paper released on Tuesday by the Scottish Government which delved into how European nations similar in size to Scotland have thrived in comparison to the UK in areas such as income equality and social mobility.
And he insisted the research proved Scotland "was being held back by Westminster" and demanded answers from the Prime Minister on why Scotland couldn't be independent.
Johnson's defence included accusing Blackford of trying to create trade barriers within the UK.
Blackford said: "Our First Minister started a national conversation on Scotland’s right to choose an independent future.
"When we look at nations like Iceland, Ireland, Norway and Denmark, it is clear our neighbours are outperforming the UK.
READ MORE: Scottish independence referendum to be held in October 2023, Angus Robertson says
"They deliver greater income equality, lower poverty rates, higher productivity, and business investment. The list goes on and on.
"The evidence is overwhelming, Scotland is being held back by Westminster. All those countries can use the powers of independence to create wealthier, fairer and greener societies. Why not Scotland?"
Johnson did not answer the question and argued there were "other subjects" in the national conversation, including the UK "standing strong together" in sticking up for Ukraine.
He said: "I don’t doubt my right honourable friend’s talents as a conversationalist, but I think there are other things in the national conversation right now and they include what we are doing to come through the aftershocks of Covid with the strongest jobs-led recovery of any European economy.
"I think other subjects are [also] investment in our whole country and in Scotland and the whole of the UK in the tech sector and standing strong together on the international stage and sticking up for the Ukrainians."
Blackford then highlighted how poorly the UK economy was performing with a cost-of-living crisis worse than any other G7 country.
He argued Scotland "cannot afford" to stay "trapped" in a broken Westminster system.
He added: "The Prime Minister can afford to live in his own little Britain but people have to live with the reality of a failing Westminster system.
READ MORE: Stephen Kerr claims 2014 independence referendum was 'gruesome'
"A cost of living criss worse in the UK than any other G7 country, an inflation rate double that of France, the second-worst economic growth forecast in the G20 next to only sanctioned Russia, and now the threat of a trade war with our European friends triggered by a law-breaking Prime Minister.
"That is not a vision for the future of Scotland. Our nation is big enough, rich enough and strong enough. Isn’t it the case Scotland can’t afford to stay trapped in the Westminster system? Stop the world, Scotland wants to get on."
Johnson replied: "He talks about a trade war, but what could be more foolish than a project that actually envisages trade barriers within the United Kingdom?"
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel