THE SNP have called for “transparency” in the BBC’s editorial decisions amid concerns the broadcaster is presenting a “skewed” image of public opinion on Scottish independence.
The concerns raised by the SNP centre around “vox pops” – clips which see various members of the public give their views on a certain topic.
Although only a handful of people are generally shown during a vox pop segment, many more are usually interviewed with only a select few making the final cut.
This means that journalists can balance the representation in the segment to ensure that all views are given even air time, or so that the views platformed are representative of the general public.
READ MORE: Five terrible media takes on Nicola Sturgeon's new independence campaign
However, the SNP have claimed that BBC Scotland may be presenting a “false picture of Scottish public opinion” through unrepresentative vox pops.
The party has raised concerns around segments focusing on independence, which has been pushed back to the top of the news agenda after Nicola Sturgeon and Patrick Harvie launched the first in a series of papers arguing for independence on Tuesday.
In one example, BBC Radio Scotland presented views from Dundee, Scotland’s “Yes city” which elected a majority SNP council at the local elections in May.
However, a majority of the members of the public platformed by the BBC said that they did not support a second referendum or independence.
Of the four people asked, only one supported the First Minister’s independence push, with the others saying that now was not the right time.
A second vox pop segment on BBC Radio Scotland asked people in Glasgow, another city which voted Yes overall in 2014.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson refuses to say why Scotland can't be independent at PMQs
However, of the five people platformed in Scotland’s largest city, three said they did not agree that now is “the right time for the starting gun to be fired on indyref2”.
One person said they thought it was the right time, while the fifth said they did not know about timing but would vote Yes.'
In another example, BBC Radio Scotland Drivetime host John Beattie read out four anti-independence tweets in a single segment, with no balance from the other side despite a suggestion to the contrary.
“‘My heart sank again today … Same old arguments and rhetoric coming out, importantly nothing new’,” one text finished.
Beattie went on: “Sally in Edinburgh though disagrees. ‘It’s so wrong that with launching a second independence referendum Sturgeon is promising her supporters a land of milk and honey … totally unprincipled. Civil servants have been busy pedalling SNP lies’.”
In a vox pop segment on The Nine on Tuesday night, four people were asked if they supported independence. Two said yes, while two said they did not.
An SNP spokesperson said: "These skewed vox pops are really concerning.
"BBC Scotland is, perhaps just carelessly, misleading audiences with a false picture of Scottish public opinion with these vox pops.
"Fact is that the opposite is true – polling consistently shows support for independence higher now than it was in 2014.
"It would be helpful if the BBC showed their methodology on how these views are gathered and used.
"A little bit of transparency from BBC bosses would go a long way."
A poll in early May found that 55% of Scots supported a second referendum being held in the near future.
In September 2021, polling guru Professor John Curtice said there tended to be a small majority in support of indyref2 on a five-year time scale.
The BBC has been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel