NICOLA Sturgeon has given an “absolute assurance” that the SNP will “reflect” on its internal processes after one of its MPs was suspended from the Commons.
Glasgow North MP Patrick Grady was found to have made an “unwanted sexual advance” towards a teenage member of staff.
MPs approved a two-day suspension from the Commons, meaning he will not be able to attend Parliament on Monday and Tuesday next week, after an independent investigation found he had breached Parliament’s sexual misconduct policy.
The SNP’s Westminster group also decided to hand Grady a two-day suspension.
The man he targeted, who was 19 at the time, said he is “bitterly disappointed” at the “lenient” sanction.
A report into his conduct said that Grady “made an unwanted sexual advance to the complainant that included the touching and stroking of the complainant’s neck, hair, and back”, with the report adding he was “under the influence of alcohol” at the SNP social event in 2016.
READ MORE: Staffer who made sexual harassment complaint against SNP MP speaks out
The complainant also criticised the SNP’s handling of the situation, saying he has been made to feel as though it is his fault, and said his life has been a “living hell”.
Speaking to STV News on Thursday, Nicola Sturgeon said: “I think, like all organisations in these situations, we need to reflect on any view from a complainant that the process that was undertaken, rather than helping to resolve an issue, perhaps made the experience more difficult.
“That’s what the complainer in this case has said and rather than being defensive or saying ‘we don’t agree with all the details of that’, I think it’s right for the SNP to reflect on how we make sure in future our processes are what people would expect them to be.”
She added: “One of the things that is so important here is that when people suffer this kind of behaviour … that the process they go through should not make the experience or the trauma that they have suffered worse.
“If any complainer feels that is the case then whatever organisation that has been at stake here, they have to reflect on that and I give an absolute assurance that the SNP will.”
The complainant, speaking anonymously to the Daily Record on Thursday, said he felt the SNP had prioritised Grady (above) in its investigation, something Sturgeon said she hoped “was not the case”.
“If that is what a complainer feels, then we have a duty to carefully consider that and reflect on that,” she said.
The complainant, now aged 25, said that “the SNP has made me feel like it’s my fault” and described the party’s treatment of him as “bullying” and called for Grady to stand down as an MP, claiming he was “not fit” for the office.
He told the newspaper: “Since making the complaint, it has been a living hell.
“I was punished by the party as a whole.
“Not any single individual but I think as a collective I’ve been punished.”
Sturgeon said it was for the SNP Westminster group to ensure the complainant was “not in any way disadvantaged in their working environment”.
On the punishment levelled at the MP, the First Minister said it was the result of a “recommendation from an independent House of Commons standards process that all parties have agreed to respect and accept”.
READ MORE: Chief of UK Armed Forces won't comment on SNP's drive for Scottish independence
“I’ve read the report carefully, as you would expect me to do, it’s very clear that Patrick is in the wrong and was in the wrong and behaved in a way that he should not have behaved,” she said.
“It also sets out clearly that the sexual advance was unwanted, but when Patrick knew it was unwanted he didn’t persist and that his remorse is genuine and that he has taken steps himself to do training and awareness raising to understand why his behaviour in that situation was so wrong.
“The independent process has determined what an appropriate sanction is and the SNP group has applied a sanction as well.”
The First Minister also appeared to rule out a further party investigation, after the SNP’s Westminster group decided on the two-day suspension after a meeting on Tuesday.
“The Westminster group has considered the process, it has applied its own sanction,” she said.
“I absolutely understand that in these situations there will always be people that think the sanctions should be tougher and harder.
“It is important that we listen to independent processes, learn from this – I am particularly mindful of the comments that the complainer has made … with the leader of our Westminster group, I will certainly ensure we reflect properly on that.”
In a statement to the Commons, Grady said: “My behaviour and the intent behind it was a significant breach of the behaviour code and sexual misconduct policy for the UK Parliament.
“The breach is aggravated by a considerable disparity in age and authority between myself and the complainant and further aggravated by excessive consumption of alcohol on my part.
“I was wrong to make assumptions about the social and personal relationship that existed or had potential to exist between myself and the complainant, and wrong to act on those assumptions.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel