UKRAINE'S public broadcaster said it is “disappointed” Eurovision bosses have decided it cannot host next year’s contest and called for negotiations on a new location to be put on hold.
The European Broadcasting Union (EBU) is currently in talks with the BBC over whether the UK could host the annual event, after Sam Ryder came runner-up in Turin earlier this year.
But UA:PBC, Ukraine’s public service broadcaster, released a statement on Friday in which it claimed the EBU had “denied Ukraine the right to host Eurovision 2023” after analysing the security situation in the war-torn country.
Mykola Chernotytskyi, head of the managing board of UA:PBC, said: “We are disappointed with this decision of the EBU.
“During this month, a large number of people in Ukraine have thrown all their efforts to fulfil the conditions for holding Eurovision in our country. Security is, of course, our first priority.
“The team of UA: PBC, state and local authorities did a thorough job and offered different options.
“It is a pity to see such an unappealable statement, therefore, we ask our partners to hold further negotiations.”
The @EBU_HQ has issued the statement below regarding the hosting of next year’s #Eurovision Song Contest.
— Eurovision Song Contest (@Eurovision) June 17, 2022
Find it online here ➡️ https://t.co/mAxSdReBj3 pic.twitter.com/JYqy58eHqV
The broadcaster’s statement went on to detail a meeting on June 14 in which organisers from Ukraine met with representatives of the EBU and the contest itself.
They discussed the issue of security and three potential hosting locations – Lviv, Zakarpattia on the border with Hungary and Slovakia, and Kyiv.
The statement continued: “As a reminder, after the victory of Kalush Orchestra at Eurovision 2022 in Turin, Ukraine gained the right to host the Song Contest next year.
“UA:PBC as a member of the European Broadcasting Union ensures the selection and participation of a representative of Ukraine in the Eurovision Song Contest, is an official broadcaster of the contest, and organises the contest the following year in case of Ukraine’s victory.”
A joint statement from Chernotytskyi, Ukraine’s culture minister Tkachenko Oleksandr and two previous Ukrainian winners of the contest – including Kalush Orchestra – demanded a change to the decision.
Elsewhere, First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has offered up Glasgow as a potential destination for the contest, tweeting: “I can think of a perfect venue on banks of the River Clyde!!”
The OVO Hydro arena in Glasgow said it would be “delighted” to be involved in discussions.
We wish @Eurovision could be in Ukraine but understand that in circumstances this isn’t possible.
— Nicola Sturgeon (@NicolaSturgeon) June 17, 2022
However, I can think of a perfect venue on banks of the River Clyde!! @scotgov is happy to discuss with BBC, @GlasgowCC @EBU_HQ and others https://t.co/74YzxlWgWh
In a statement, the venue said: “We are naturally disappointed that, as announced, Ukraine will not be able to host Eurovision 2023.
“If Glasgow is being considered as a potential host city for the event, we’d be delighted to take part in that conversation.”
Fans have speculated the venue will be chosen to host next year’s contest as it doesn’t have any events scheduled for May 2023.
Downing Street has also welcomed the possibility of the UK hosting Eurovision if Ukraine cannot.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon offers up Glasgow as Eurovision 2023 host amid BBC and EBU discussions
A No 10 spokesperson said: “Ukraine’s victory in the Eurovision song contest was richly deserved and as the rightful winner the Government’s firm wish has been to see next year’s contest hosted there.
“If the EBU decides the competition can’t go ahead in Ukraine, we would of course welcome the opportunity to work closely with Ukraine and the BBC to host it here in the UK.
“But we would be committed to ensuring it overwhelmingly reflects Ukraine’s rich culture, heritage and creativity, as well as building on the ongoing partnership between our two countries.”
Asked if the Government would help the BBC with the costs, the spokesperson said: “We’re slightly getting ahead of ourselves in terms of the process.”
The BBC said in a brief statement: “We have seen the announcement from the EBU. Clearly these aren’t a set of circumstances that anyone would want.
“Following their decision, we will of course discuss the BBC hosting the Eurovision Song Contest.”
It comes after the UK’s Ryder topped the jury vote in Turin in May but Kalush Orchestra went on to win overall after a symbolic show of public support which saw them soar to first place with 631 points.
They had been the frontrunners since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February – which prompted organisers to ban the Russian entrant from competing.
Ukraine joined the international contest in 2003 and its three wins make it one of the most successful of the newer competitor countries, having also triumphed in 2004 and 2016.
If the UK does host the contest in 2023, it would be the ninth time it has taken place here – more than any other country.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel