NICOLA Sturgeon is planning to hold a consultative second independence referendum in order to bypass any legal difficulties involved in the Union being reserved, according to reports.
Whether or not Holyrood has the power to hold an independence vote is a matter of legal argument. In 2014, the UK Government granted a Section 30 order allowing the Scottish Government to legislate for the vote without legal problems.
However, Boris Johnson has remained steadfast in his opposition to a second vote and the chances of him granting a similar order seem slim.
An “illegal wildcat” referendum without Westminster’s approval, as the Scottish Conservatives have branded it, risks being challenged in the Supreme Court, or boycotted by Unionists and its legitimacy undermined.
However, SNP chiefs believe that a consultative ballot is within the powers of the Scottish Government and has a better chance of bypassing legal troubles, according to reports in The Times.
Legal experts are reportedly sceptical that asking a question with a view to opening independence discussions with the UK Government, rather than simply declaring independence, is more likely to pass the courts.
A source told The Times that the SNP leadership regards a consultative referendum as “win, win” which would not be unofficial in any way.
Constitution Secretary Angus Robertson has said that the Scottish Government plans to hold a second independence referendum in October 2023.
Sturgeon has made clear that her Government aims to have this happen with or without a Section 30 order from Westminster.
Whitehall officials, in correspondence sent before devolution, conceded that the laws in place would seemingly allow Scotland to “have referendums on anything it wants, even if it cannot enact the result”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel