A DEBATE is set to be held over a "totally inappropriate" second attempt to build an "exclusive resort" on the shores of Loch Lomond in the Scottish Parliament on Wednesday.
Green MSP Ross Greer, who campaigned fiercely against the initial proposal from Yorkshire-based Flamingo Land, will lead the debate which he says will give MSPs a chance to reflect on residents' concerns.
Flamingo Land has set out a new proposal for a tourist spot in the area after the last one was withdrawn in 2019 following the submission of some 60,000 objections.
While campaigners have been successful in having the ancient woodland at Drumkinnon Woods removed from the plans this time, the revised proposal would still see development on a huge scale, including 127 self-catering lodges of varying sizes, a hotel with up to 60 beds, a waterpark, a craft brewery, and a monorail.
Flamingo Land said it has now adopted an “enhanced ecological approach” to protect the local environment.
Greer said: “I’m pleased to have secured the debate, which will give MSPs the chance to explore the issues with Flamingo Land’s plans and reflect on the concerns of local residents.
READ MORE: Scottish Greens vow to fight against new plans for Loch Lomond site
"While there are some welcome concessions from the developer this time – especially the exclusion of Drumkinnon Woods from the plans - the proposals are still on a scale which is totally inappropriate, and which would have huge consequences for Balloch and Loch Lomond.
“As West Dunbartonshire council pointed out last time, this would put huge pressure on local roads which already struggle to cope during tourist seasons.
"I’m still concerned by the effect this largely enclosed resort would have on existing local businesses, who could see trade drawn away from them.
"And that’s not to mention the impact such a huge development will have on the world-famous natural landscape of Loch Lomond, the very thing tourists come to see in the first place.
“One of the things which makes Balloch so special is how it makes Loch Lomond accessible to anyone who can afford a train fare from Glasgow. Putting an exclusive resort in the way of that would be a step backwards.”
READ MORE: RMT's Mick Lynch tells Tory minister what we'd all like to hear more of during Newsnight segment
The motion to be debated on Wednesday reads: "That the Parliament notes the reported application lodged by the Yorkshire-based theme park operator, Flamingo Land, for the development of a so-called "luxury resort" on the banks of Loch Lomond at Balloch; understands that this is Flamingo Land’s second application for a development on the site, with the first application reportedly having been withdrawn following a record 60,000 objections being lodged with the Loch Lomond and The Trossachs National Park authority; congratulates local residents and the Save Loch Lomond campaign for, it believes, having protected the ancient woodland at Drumkinnon Woods, which it understands is no longer the proposed location for dozens of guest lodges, but remains concerned about a number of reported issues with the current application, including its overall scale, public access to Drumkinnon Woods and the wider site, pressure on local roads and the principle of selling public land at one of Scotland’s most famous locations to a private developer."
Jim Paterson, development director for the Lomond Banks project, has said the project would be beneficial to the local community.
He said: “After an extensive period of reflection, community liaison, and enhanced ecological studies to make Lomond Banks the best it can be, I am delighted to be submitting our plans and taking forward a proposal which we believe is both robust and of benefit to the local community."
He said Flamingo Land wanted to complement what makes Loch Lomond so attractive to visitors.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel