THE Tories have been called hypocrites for looking to cut limits on bankers’ bonuses while calling for restraint on increasing public sector pay.
Steve Barclay, Downing Street's chief of staff, has reportedly written to Rishi Sunak about a scheme for “deregulatory measures to reduce the overall burden on business”.
The plan would involve lifting restrictions on director and non-executive director pay, according to a leaked copy of the letter seen by the i newspaper.
The move has sparked fury among opposition parties and unions who say that the move is steeped in hypocrisy as public sector workers are being told to “tighten their belts” amid the cost of living crisis.
READ MORE: Tory who called Nicola Sturgeon a 'drooling hag' gets top paid job at Fife Council
Commenting SNP MSP Elena Whitham said: “It is quite frankly obscene that when families are struggling with a cost of living crisis created by the Tories, Westminster is choosing to help their banking pals rake in even more money whilst preaching to the rest of us to live within our means.
“It appears that if you are in Westminster or pals with Tory ministers then you are exempt from the collective responsibility the Chancellor has repeatedly spoken of - once again it’s one rule for them and another for the rest of us.
“This is dripping double standards, that we see day after day, of a broken Westminster system that Scotland knows it can do better than.”
In his letter, Barclay wrote: “I trust you’ll agree this is a more proportionate regulatory response and reflective of the new approach to regulation outlined in the ‘Benefits of Brexit’ publication in January.”
Barclay also reportedly asked Business Secretary Kwasi Kwarteng to detail measures that could ease the alleged burden on business, while explicitly referring to a change to limits on bosses’ pay.
The Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) confirmed it is looking into “whether there are any unnecessary restrictions on paying non-executive directors in shares, which could ensure they are fully invested”.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon sets the date for the 'route map' to indyref2
Meanwhile, No 10 also confirmed the plan saying they were assessing how non-executive directors were paid, not how much – including ditching “unnecessary restrictions on paying non-executive directors shares”.
Boris Johnson's official spokesman said: “There’s no plans to change the cap on executive pay, I think the issue that’s being investigated is how non-executive directors are paid rather than what CEOs or directors are paid,”
However, Labour have accused the Tories of using “two sets of rules” – one for rich people in the City of London and another for workers elsewhere.
Baroness Smith, the party’s leader in the Lords, said: “On one hand, we’re telling those who are working that you must have wage restraint. Does it not seem somewhat hypocritical to be saying to the City that those constraints, those curbs that have been in place are to be removed?”
Labour’s shadow business secretary Jonathan Reynolds added: “It’s the hallmark of a government that lurches from crisis to crisis that instead of giving businesses real certainty, they’re looking down the sofa for random ideas.”
Frances O’Grady, the general secretary of the Trade Unions Congress, also called out the Government’s plan. She tweeted: “Key workers told to tighten their belts, City executives told to help themselves,
“Britain deserves better.”
A BEIS spokesperson said: “As announced last month, we are looking to strengthen the rules on clawing back bonuses from directors if their company collapses to stamp out ‘rewards for failure’.
“By the same token, we are also exploring whether there are any unnecessary restrictions on paying non-executive directors in shares, which could ensure they are fully invested in the success of the company they run. If the company does well, directors do well.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel