THE No side won the 2014 referendum and Scotland should just "live with it", the former chief of Better Together has said.
Alistair Darling, a Labour peer and former chancellor, led the pro-Union campaign ahead of the 2014 vote.
Speaking to Andrew Marr on LBC, he claimed that First Minister Nicola Sturgeon did not want a second referendum, despite her public push to hold one.
Darling suggested the Scottish Government did not know how it could hold a referendum legally without the consent of Westminster – although constitutional experts such as former Tory MSP Adam Tomkins have said that it is possible.
He also claimed that a second independence vote was a “distraction” aimed at keeping SNP supporters “going”.
The Labour peer said: “I don't think she [Sturgeon] wants her referendum any more than I do, because I think if you had it today, she'd lose.
“It's interesting she recognised the Border problem, she said it was a challenge. Well, we've seen in Northern Ireland what happens when you stick a border in the United Kingdom – it is more than a challenge … it's a complete disaster.
“And equally, you know, I used to go on and on and on about the currency question in 2014 and we’ve not got an answer to that yet, what currency will we have? She's got to, you know, she's got to keep her own troops going.”
The First Minister (below) is due to announce how the Scottish Government will legislate for a second referendum on Tuesday next week.
Darling said that a second vote would be a “disaster” for the Yes side if it was lost, adding: “The majority of people in Scotland have indicated time and time again that they don't want one, you know, in the next two to five years.
“We've got a war going on in Europe ... We've got a massive cost of living problem. There are huge problems in health and education and so on.
“You know, I think people will be more pleased if we were dealing with those rather than referendums as you've seen in the UK with Brexit, they are extremely divisive. And the scars in Scotland are still there you know, eight years later.”
Darling suggested that Sturgeon had “given up” on tackling key issues and was instead presenting independence as “Nirvana”.
The latest Ipsos Mori survey showed the two sides of the independence debate deadlocked at 50%, with separate research from the Scottish Election Study showing that the majority of Scots believe the SNP-Green government has a mandate to hold indyref2.
Asked about Boris Johnson’s (above) effect on the independence question, Darling was critical of the Prime Minister, but played down his role in the debate.
He said: “It's interesting that you know, seven years, eight years after the referendum, despite Brexit, despite Boris Johnson, if you look at the polling, the No vote has remained consistently ahead of the Yes vote. Not much, but it has, which shows that the people that you would need to win a referendum from the nationalists’ point of view are not shifting.
“There is no doubt that Boris Johnson is a recruiting sergeant, you know, for Scottish nationalists … I do not think he's fit to be Prime Minister.
READ MORE: Andrew Marr's REAL views on independence revealed in book festival rant
“I think he's dragging us down internationally. I think you know, the fact you've got somebody you cannot rely on what he's saying. And he's been doing this for years, that to me, renders him unfit to be Prime Minister.”
On Brexit, the Labour grandee added: “I voted to stay in the European Union. You know, I believe in open trade, I believe in working with people, but I recognise that there was a referendum. Five or six years ago, my side lost with this so we have to live with it, just as the way that you know, in Scotland I wish we just lived with the result. Let's live with it.”
Responding, the SNP said Darling should "apologise to the people of Scotland for the multiple disasters his No campaign has delivered".
Stewart Hosie MP (above), the party's independence campaign coordinator, went on: “He should answer for a litany of broken promises, with Scotland now suffering the catastrophic consequences of the Brexit the No campaign said would never happen, the Prime Minister they said would never be in Downing Street and a cost of living crisis which the broken Westminster system is fuelling.
“While Lord Darling rakes in £300 a day for simply turning up in the House of Lords, millions of people across Scotland are struggling to pay for their weekly shopping, terrified to open their energy bills and subject to state pensions which lag far behind those of many of our neighbours.
“The people of Scotland have secured a cast-iron democratic mandate to decide their own future when they elected the biggest pro-independence majority of MSPs ever returned to Holyrood – and the Trump-like efforts of Boris Johnson, Alistair Darling and others to deny that democratic reality sound increasingly absurd.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel