The Prince of Wales has met business leaders in Rwanda as the row of words continued over Charles’ reported criticism of the Government’s scheme to send asylum seekers to the African country.
During his visit to the Commonwealth Business Forum Exhibition village in Kigali, the heir to the throne chatted to David Salmon, 21, a Jamaican scholar, who after meeting the royal spoke of his wish for his homeland to become a republic.
But Charles’ trip to Rwanda, to formally open the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) on Friday, has been overshadowed by his reported comment about the asylum seeker policy, disrupted by legal problems, which he described as “appalling” in private remarks.
Boris Johnson has already struck out at “condescending” opponents of his scheme ahead of talks with the heir to the throne.
It is understood the Prime Minister will visit Charles for a cup of tea on Friday morning, but Mr Johnson is not eager to raise the policy of removing migrants who arrive by unauthorised means on a one-way ticket.
Charles was welcomed to the exhibition village by Clare Akamanzi, chief executive officer of the Rwanda Development Board and Jeremy Cross, the Prince’s Foundation’s international director.
He made his way to Virunga Hall, to meet with stakeholders involved in Commonwealth efforts on sustainable cities, where he visited the wide range of businesses who are exhibiting and taking part in the Commonwealth Business Forum.
Mr Salmon, from Kingston and a graduate of the University of West Indies, has benefitted from the Prince of Wales Commonwealth Scholarship scheme, and is about to do an MPhil in development studies at Cambridge University.
Charles has convened university chancellors on the scholarship, which royal sources said has recently been “revitalised” for small islands and developing states.
The prince and 21-year-old discussed how to make agriculture and the coffee industry more efficient, and after meeting the royal, Mr Salmon said: “I think Jamaica should become a republic but I don’t think we should leave the Commonwealth. It would be a sign of our confidence, our independence and our maturity as a nation.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here