BORIS Johnson wanted to build a £150,000 treehouse at Chequers, it has been revealed – and it would have been funded by a donor who played a central role in another infamous saga of the Prime Minister's.
The UK may be in a cost of living crisis, but thanks to the Union that Labour insists Scotland cannot even have a vote on, a lawbreaker-in-chief who thinks that’s a sensible use of money is who will be steering the ship.
The plan for the extortionately priced add-on in the grounds of the Prime Minister's traditional country house has been revealed by The Times, and it only fell through because of security concerns.
The paper was told that Johnson and wife Carrie plotted the treehouse in 2020 for their son Wilf.
At least, that was the claim. Just earlier this week, a Tory by-election candidate hid in a dance studio to avoid facing the media over a humiliating defeat. Boris Johnson famously ducked into a fridge to avoid tough questions. And we’ve even seen Douglas Ross hiding from our reporter in a lift.
A £150k treehouse sounds like a rather useful spot for the Tory leader to avoid scrutiny...
READ MORE: Question Time: Fiona Bruce criticised for 'attacking' Mick Lynch
The story has also served as a reminder of another angle of the Conservative Party’s recent horrific headlines – because sources told the paper that there were discussions on Tory donor Lord Brownlow funding it.
Does that name sound familiar? It should.
Brownlow put up £112,000 towards the refurbishment of the flat above No 11 Downing Street after Boris and Carrie moved in.
The Electoral Commission ruled that the party had broken the law by failing to disclose some of the donation and was fined – Johnson repaid the money.
He was accused of “corruption, plain and simple” earlier this year after his ethics adviser released damning text messages he exchanged with Tory donor Brownlow.
The messages showed that despite telling his ethics tsar, Lord Christopher Geidt, who has since resigned, that he had no idea how the revamp was being funded, Johnson had personally asked for more cash for the project months earlier.
In the messages, Johnson asks the former Tory Party vice-chair to approve more funding for the flat renovation as it was “still a bit of a tip”. He finishes by saying that he is “on the great exhibition plan”.
The Tory peer replied that “approval is a doddle” as he knew where the cash was and the “Trust isn’t set up yet”, and thanked the Prime Minister for “thinking about GE2”.
This “Great Exhibition 2.0” was apparently a pet project of Brownlow’s, and he met with then culture secretary Oliver Dowden to discuss the idea in January 2021.
Dowden resigned this week (are you seeing a theme, here?) as Tory Party chairman after disastrous by-election results for the party.
Number 10 denied any link between Brownlow funding Johnson’s flat revamp and the meeting with the Culture Secretary.
READ MORE: The question of an independent Scotland's currency answered in 40 seconds
The treehouse was abandoned because of security fears that it could be seen from a nearby road, The Times said.
The design would have included bulletproof glass, though it's not clear what else was inflating the price-tag to such an extent.
One UK Government source told The Times that the PM had also been advised “it would look terrible” to be splashing this much cash on the treehouse.
The real story here would be Boris Johnson finally caring about how morally acceptable something looks.
Brownlow did not respond to the paper’s request for the comment, but a government spokesman said: “We do not comment on private or family matters which do not involve any ministerial declarations or taxpayer funds.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel