BORIS Johnson's government has dropped “human rights” and the “rule of law” from its list of objectives in securing a trade deal with Gulf states.
Both issues were included during a consultation published in October on what the trade deal should achieve.
However, neither made it into the final list which was published this week.
Earlier in the week, International trade secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan met representatives of the Gulf Co-operation Council (GCC) in Riyadh to begin negotiations with the six-nation bloc, which includes Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, and the UAE.
READ MORE: 'We've been really hard hit': Scots firm sacks half of staff due to Brexit impact
Trade between the UK and the GCC is already worth £3.1 billion, with the group being the UK’s seventh largest trading partner.
The UK Government has said such a trade deal could boost the UK economy by up to £1.6bn a year.
But as ministers seek to negotiate a deal wth the Gulf states, human rights groups, trade unions and opposition parties have taken aim at the Tories for “wilfully ignoring serious human rights violations”.
During a government consulation people were asked what the UK’s priorities should be in a free trade deal with the states, including labour standards, gender equality, climate change, human rights and the rule of law.
Human rights and the rule of law were the only two items on the list not to be included in the final deal.
The Scottish Greens said successive UK governments have prioritised arms deals over human rights.
MSP Maggie Chapman told The National: "This is shocking, but it is not at all surprising. When it comes to foreign policy, especially in the Gulf region, successive UK governments have spent decades prioritising arms sales and cosy relationships with dictatorships ahead of human rights. It is telling that they don't even feel the need to pretend anymore."
"There is seemingly no low that Boris Johnson and his colleagues won't sink to in order to strengthen the brutally repressive regimes they are all too happy to do business with, or to cement the deeply damaging Brexit deal that they negotiated."
"Human rights and democracy cannot be optional. If the UK is to play any kind of positive role on the world stage then they have to be at the heart of foreign policy, as they would be in the green and independent Scotland that we want to build."
Allan Hogarth, head of policy at Amnesty International, said women in the region faced “deep-rooted discrimination” while bans on trade unions “are common”.
He said: “A UK-Gulf trade deal which remained silent on these issues would be wilfully ignoring serious human rights violations.”
The Trade Union Congress (TUC) said the UK Government should not “entertain” a trade deal with the nations without tackling human rights violations in the area.
Paul Nowak, deputy general secretary of the TUC, said: “The Gulf states’ appalling record on human rights and workers’ rights is no secret, and yet the government is rushing into trade talks, no questions asked."
He accused the Tories of “turning a blind eye to fundamental rights abuses” as he urged the government to use its leverage to “ensure respect for fundamental workers’ and human rights”.
He said: “Banning trade unions, forced labour, severe exploitation of migrant workers and other labour rights abuses are all widespread – as are attacks on women’s rights, LGBTQ+ rights and the oppression of marginalised communities.”
Emily Thornberry, Labour's shadow international trade secretary, said: "Yet again, we have a government acting as though human rights and the rule of law are optional extras, to be discarded at will, rather than principles and values that are fundamental to what we stand for as a country.
"It is wrong, it is immoral, and it is doing untold damage to our reputation around the world."
A Department for International Trade (DIT) source said it was wrong to say that both the rule of law and human rights had been dropped for its goals, saying their inclusion in the consultation process did not mean they would become objectives.
READ MORE: Brexit impact causes successful Scots firm to end all international trade
A DIT spokesperson said: “The UK is a leading advocate for human rights around the world and the FCDO lead on our efforts to promote universal human rights.
“It is our experience that secure and growing trade relationships can increase UK influence and help us to open conversations with partners on a range of issues, including human rights.”
Announcing the start of negotiations, trade secretary Trevelyan said: “This trade deal has the potential to support jobs from Dover to Doha, growing our economy at home, building vital green industries and supplying innovative services to the gulf.”
It comes as the UK Government seeks new trade deals after leaving the European Union.
An analysis by the UK Trade Policy Observatory in November 2021 found that the UK’s Brexit losses were more than 178 times bigger than its likely gains from future trade deals.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel