AN SNP MSP has apologised after being photographed holding the flag of an ultranationalist group at a pro-independence event.
Evelyn Tweed issued a statement after posting a picture with the banner for Siol nan Gaidheal during an event at Bannockburn on Saturday.
The organisation, founded in the late 1970s, was kicked out of the SNP in 1982 for extremist views. Then-leader Gordon Wilson described the group, which translates as Seed of the Gael in English, as “proto-fascist”.
Having posted the photo from the rally, Tweed posted: “Delighted to attend the Battle of Bannockburn commemoration … a moving commemoration for those who fought and lost their lives on both sides.”
The Stirling MSP tagged SNP councillor for Bannockburn Brian Hambly and members of her branch, but later removed the tweet and issued an apology.
“Apologies for my last post now deleted when the flag was pointed out,” she wrote. “Just to be clear, I do not support any form of ultra-nationalism.”
A source close to the MSP told The Times that as she posed for the photo, a man waving the flag jumped in front of her. Unaware of the symbolism of the banner, she held it down to stop it flying in front of her face, the source said.
Apologies for my last post now deleted when the flag was pointed out. Just to be clear, I do not support any form of ultra nationalism.
— Evelyn Tweed MSP (@EvelynTweedSNP) June 26, 2022
Scottish Tory chief whip Stephen Kerr said he was “fairly shocked” to see the photograph of Twee and insisted the SNP have “serious questions to answer”.
Fairly shocked to see SNP MSP Evelyn Tweed holding the flag of an ethnic nationalist group.
— Stephen Kerr MSP (@RealStephenKerr) June 26, 2022
With yesterday's march, Stirling SNP have some serious questions to answer. pic.twitter.com/iTqthftHzI
Former Better Together chief Blair McDougall raised doubts about the SNP MSP’s apology as he posted a wider group shot of Tweed and other attendees posing for the photo.
He posted: “Her denial of support for Siol nan Gaidheal or ultranationalism ring a hollow when you see the full photo. Half a dozen people with the proto-facsist group’s emblem. People l in medieval garb around her. Someone brandishing an axe. Easy to see how she missed it.”
Her denial of support for Siol nan Gaidheal or ultranationalism ring a hollow when you see the full photo. Half a dozen people with the proto-facsist group’s emblem. People l in medieval garb around her. Someone brandishing an axe. Easy to see how she missed it. pic.twitter.com/ZtMOB9e9js
— Blair McDougall (@blairmcdougall) June 26, 2022
READ MORE: English independence voters hit back at ethno-nationalists Siol Nan Gaidheal
Academic Peter Lynch, in his history of the SNP, describes Siol nan Gaidheal as “a collection of radical militants who favoured direct action tactics and tended to make vague threats of violence”.
Following the group’s expulsion from the party in 1982, a new group called Arm nan Gaidheal was formed. That year, it claimed responsibility for fire-raising attacks on Labour and Conservative offices in Glasgow and Dundee.
Eight of the organisation’s members were arrested following an arson attack on the home of the chief executive of Glasgow chamber of commerce in 1983.
The modern Siol nan Gaidheal has sought to distance itself from the group’s violent past, branding itself a “third manifestation” of the organisation.
In 2018, members of the Yes movement raised concerns about the group’s presence at independence events.
Math Campbell, the convener of English Scots for Yes, said Siol Nan Gaidheal were not representative of the Yes movement, describing them as a “very small group of malcontents, who are using the same tactics as Britain First”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel