BORIS Johnson’s position on a second referendum remains “unchanged” following the announcement of the Scottish Government’s route map to a vote next year, Downing Street said.
A No 10 spokesperson said the Prime Minister would “carefully study” the proposal outlined by Nicola Sturgeon, which includes the Lord Advocate seeking a view from the UK Supreme Court on whether Holyrood has the powers to hold a vote.
Speaking to reporters as he travelled to Madrid for the Nato summit, Johnson also said he would study the plans but added “the focus of the country should be on building a stronger economy”.
“I haven’t seen exactly what she’s said yet,” he said.
“We will study it very carefully and we will respond properly
“The focus of the country should be on building a stronger economy, that’s what we’re doing with our plan for a stronger economy and I certainly think that we’ll be able to have a stronger economy and a stronger country together.”
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon's five steps to an independence referendum, explained
A Downing Street spokesman said: “Our position remains unchanged that both ours and the Scottish Government’s priority should be working together with a relentless focus on the issues that we know matter to people up and down the country.
“That remains our priority, but a decision has been taken by the First Minister, so we will carefully study the details of the proposal, and the Supreme Court will now consider whether to accept the Scottish Government’s Lord Advocate referral”.
Asked whether the Prime Minister would open negotiations for independence in Scotland if Scots vote for it in a referendum in October 2023, the official said: “We’re obviously not going to get into hypotheticals”.
READ MORE: Scottish Independence Referendum Bill published - read the document in full
The spokesman was not sure whether Johnson had received a letter from Nicola Sturgeon, in which she called for negotiations on a Section 30 order.
He added the Prime Minister “continues to think it’s not the time to be talking about a referendum, but as I say, it’s important that we carefully study the details of the proposal and it’s for the Supreme Court now to look at the Lord Advocate referral”.
Following Sturgeon's statement at Holyrood, opposition politicians criticised the referendum plans.
Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross said his party would not participate in a "potentially illegal" referendum.
He added: “We won’t play Nicola Sturgeon’s games. We won’t take part in a pretend poll when there is real work to be done."
Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar said the First Minister’s timing was wrong in launching the campaign since the covid pandemic was still causing people to lose their lives.
He said: “For households across Scotland, it doesn’t feel like this crisis is over.
“Isn’t it the case that the pandemic Nicola that said she wanted us to pull us through is gone and the partisan Nicola Sturgeon that wants to divide our country is back, pursuing a referendum that two-thirds of Scots don’t want right now.”
Scottish Liberal Democrats leader Alex Cole-Hamilton asked Sturgeon why her “fixation with breaking up the United Kingdom will always trump the needs of the people in the country”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel