FORMER Formula One supremo Bernie Ecclestone has said he would “take a bullet” for Russian president Vladimir Putin and described him as “a first-class person”.
Ecclestone was asked on ITV’s Good Morning Britain if he still regards Putin as a friend - the pair have been close since around 2014, when the Russian Grand Prix was introduced.
In 2019, the 91-year-old revealed he believed Russia should be "running Europe" in an interview with The Times.
Even since Putin's invasion of Ukraine, Ecclestone has defended the Russian president.
On Thursday he told Good Morning Britain viewers: “I’d still take a bullet for [Putin].
Bernie Ecclestone on #GMB
— nazir afzal (@nazirafzal) June 30, 2022
Putin - “I’d still take a bullet for him”
Zelenskyy - “he could have stopped the war”
Lewis Hamilton facing racism - “he should get over it”
If he dies before me, I will tell you my Bernie story, but it may not come as a surprisepic.twitter.com/2lUN2BBTIQ
"I’d rather it didn’t hurt, but if it does I’d still take a bullet, because he’s a first-class person.
“What he’s doing is something that he believed was the right thing he was doing for Russia.
“Unfortunately, he’s like a lot of business people, certainly like me, we make mistakes from time to time. When you’ve made the mistake, you have to do the best you can to get out of it.
“I think if it had been conducted properly, I mean the other person in Ukraine, I mean, his profession, I understand, he used to be a comedian.
“I think he seems as if he wants to continue that profession, because I think if he’d have thought about things, he would have definitely made a big enough effort to speak to Mr Putin, who is a sensible person and would have listened to him and could have probably done something about it.”
READ MORE: Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky meets Sir Richard Branson in Kyiv
Ecclestone added that the war in Ukraine was not “intentional”, saying: “And I’m quite sure Ukraine, if they’d wanted to get out of it properly, could have done.”
His comments come after Nato agreed a “fundamental shift” which will see it return to Cold War-style readiness to respond to the increased threat posed by Russia.
Prime Minister Boris Johnson said Putin had been proved “completely wrong” about the strength of the defence alliance, which is set to expand to include Sweden and Finland after they ended decades of neutrality over concerns about Russia.
Leaders of the 30 Nato members gathered in Madrid to agree a new plan for the alliance in response to the invasion of Ukraine.
The move will mean 300,000 troops at high readiness next year, up from the current level of 40,000.
READ MORE: ‘We are outgunned and outnumbered by Russia’ – Ukrainian politician
For the UK, this will mean the “majority” of naval forces – including one of the aircraft carriers and its support vessels – being available to Nato, along with extra air squadrons and land brigade-sized units.
Nato secretary general Jens Stoltenberg said: “Today, Nato leaders decided a fundamental shift in our defence and deterrence to respond to a new security reality.”
Heavy equipment will be pre-positioned in eastern Nato members along with stockpiles of supplies, while forces from western members will be assigned specific regions on the eastern flank to protect in partnership with local troops.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel