DOUGLAS Ross failed to mention indyref2 during his grilling of the First Minister in parliament today.
In what appeared to be a deliberate attempt to prevent the SNP leader from speaking about independence, the Scottish Tory leader used all of his four questions to ask about Nicola Sturgeon’s record on policing.
It comes after the major announcement from the Scottish Government it intends to take on Westminster in the Supreme Court to win the right to hold a second poll on Scotland’s future.
Ross pledged earlier this week his party would not “take part in a pretend poll when there's real work to be done”.
READ MORE: Project Fear 'in overdrive' amid claims indy Scotland would BAN Fortnum & Mason hampers
At no point did Ross mention independence, even to attack Sturgeon, in the last session of First Minister’s Questions before the lengthy summer recess.
Asked if the move was a deliberate strategy to knock independence off the news agenda, a Scottish Tory spokesman told The National: “Would we like Nicola Sturgeon to stop talking about independence? Absolutely.
“Yeah, we would like her to stop going on about another referendum.”
Ross accused policing of not being a “priority” for the Scottish Government, after Police Scotland officers withdrew "goodwill” in protest over pay cuts.
Police officers are not able to go on strike so the industrial action is limited to officers refusing to start their shifts early or take radio equipment home.
It is the most disruptive action ever taken by police in Scotland.
“Police officers don’t believe that policing is a priority for you or your government,” Ross added.
READ MORE: Yes and No 'neck and neck' as Scottish Government prepares for indyref2
Sturgeon defended police pay, pointing out that officers in Scotland are better paid than those in England and Wales.
Ross briefly alluded to independence vaguely towards the end of the exchange, saying: “The Government has taken its eye off the ball here.
“Resources are being used elsewhere.”
He said rising levels of reports of sex crimes and violent offences were the result of a “distracted” government, without specifying the debate around independence.
Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar took a similar approach, sternly interrogating the First Minister on the numbers of Scots waiting on diagnostic tests for conditions including cancer.
He blasted the Scottish Government over figures published earlier this week which showed a record level of people were waiting too long for treatment.
In the first three months of this year, only 76.9% of patients received their first treatment within 62 days of a referral for an urgent suspicion of cancer – which is the Government’s gold standard for treating cancer patients quickly. This was down from 79.1% in the previous quarter.
Towards the end of the exchange, Sarwar slammed the SNP’s focus, which he said was taking its attention off improving health services.
He said: “We’ve gone back to the decisive Nicola Sturgeon, who is now spending seven days a week, sometimes what feels like 24 hours a day focusing on what she cares about; breaking up our country and dividing our people, not rebuilding it.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel