THE Scottish Parliament cannot compel the Government to release details about how laws were allegedly changed to secure the Queen’s approval, the Presiding Officer has suggested.
A leaked memo, seen by The Guardian, reveals that “it is almost certain some bills were changed before introduction to address concerns about Crown Consent”.
Scottish LibDem leader Alex Cole-Hamilton is demanding answers from Holyrood ministers, but has been told that parliament will not intervene to force the Government’s hand.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon meets with the Queen after launching indyref2 bid
Through a constitutional mechanism called “Queen’s Consent”, the monarch is given an opportunity to look over prospective laws that could affect her property and public powers.
This is not the same as Royal Assent, which is given to bills to make them acts of Parliament, as it occurs before legislation is approved by either the UK or Holyrood parliaments.
Previous reports have revealed that there had been 67 instances where the procedure had allowed the Queen to vet draft laws in Holyrood.
Buckingham Palace insists the process is “purely formal” and that the Queen does not use Crown Consent, which is what it is called in Scotland, to change the nature of bills.
Cole-Hamilton, raising a point of order following First Minister’s Question, quoted the newspaper report in Parliament.
He explained: “Alterations to exempt Crown interests in the royal household from certain aspects of law were even made before legislation was introduced to this parliament.
“We don’t know what changes were made or even which bills were changed.
“I think parliament and the public deserve to see and understand those changes.”
He asked the Presiding Office how “parliament, and the people of this country, can get sight of the changes made to legislation at the request of the Queen’s lawyers before it was introduced to this parliament”.
WATCH as Alex Cole-Hamilton requests Parliament get to see the changes made to Scottish Government legislation at the request of the Queen's lawyers pic.twitter.com/VoTkGoyCKZ
— The National (@ScotNational) June 30, 2022
READ MORE: Royal family accounts reveal more than £100m in taxpayer funding
Alison Johnstone replied: “Parliament has of course taken steps to increase transparency and awareness of this process.
“But as this is a matter which relates to pre-introduction of the Bill, it is entirely a matter for the Government.”
The Scottish Government, when approached about the initial report, said that it was legally obliged to acquiesce to Crown Consent and that MSPs could enquire about the mechanism when it was used. It also said that secrecy surrounding the substance and outcome of its talks with the Queen’s representatives was justified.
A statement read: “While the Scottish Government welcomes transparency in relation to this process, it is important that the Government protects the necessary private space ministers and officials require to explore issues and develop policy.”
Buckingham Palace declined to comment on the memo.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel