A SCOTTISH Pride event has apologised to an LGBT SNP MSP after a “mix up” saw a LibDem MP speak while she did not.
Shetland Pride, the most northerly event of its kind in the UK, attracted attention from the national media as it launched its first event.
A sold-out variety show including drag queens from Aberdeen was among the attractions which saw turn-out far exceed expectations.
READ MORE: Holyrood's youngest MSP 'pretty constantly' patronised by others in chamber
Emma Roddick, who represents the Highlands and Islands at Holyrood, had been due to address the crowds on Saturday July 2.
However, she claimed that she was told at the last minute that LibDem MP Alistair Carmichael would be “doing it instead”.
Shetland Pride’s Becky Robertson told The National they had “absolutely wanted” Roddick to speak but a mix up had affected planning.
SNP MP Anum Qaisar wrote on Twitter: “Sorry I’m confused. You were asked to step aside at a #Pride event (even though you’re a literal member of the community), for the straight male MP to speak instead?”
Sorry I’m confused. You were asked to step aside at a #pride event (even though you’re a literal member of the community), for the straight male MP to speak instead?
— Anum Qaisar MP (@AnumSNP) July 2, 2022
Roddick said this summed up the situation “in a nutshell”, but organisers have insisted that the decision was the result of a “slip up” and not political.
The MSP told The National: “It was a huge honour to be asked a few months ago to open Shetland's first Pride as its first out parliamentarian. Being in the march was an experience I will never forget, and I'm glad to have had a small part in a truly special day that visibly meant so much to so many.
“I would have put my heart and soul into the speech so was, naturally, gutted to be told while waiting by the stage that a straight MP was going to speak instead.”
READ MORE: SNP MSP appointed co-convener of LGBT+ Holyrood group
She added: “This doesn't take away from the momentousness of the occasion, but I would say to all allies: you are so important to our movement. But please, if you are trying to help, never take spaces away from members of the community. What you have to say is never going to be more important than platforming real LGBT voices, especially at an occasion like Pride.”
Shetland Pride said that Roddick had been asked to speak at the evening event, not the one at which Carmichael spoke.
Robertson later wrote on Twitter, addressing Roddick: “Hi Emma, I'm a committee member for Shetland Pride and I'd like to personally apologise for the mix up.
“We expected less than 100 folk to show up to the march and ended up with closer to 1000. When we arrived at the [Pride village taking place afterwards] I was straight on our merch stall, where I clumsily met you and asked you to wait at the marquee.
“I didn't have anything to do the planning and so wrongly assumed it was in hand. None of it was political, just poorly planned and naively underestimated. Please accept my sincere apologies!”
Carmichael said he had not realised there had been a mix up, and said he had been “delighted to accept” an offer to speak, adding: “As local MP I was going to be there anyway.”
He went on: “I have been a supporter of Shetland Pride since the project first started and I thought that the organisers did an outstanding job. I would prefer to keep my focus on the event and the hard work of the people who made it happen.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel