THE victim of sexual harassment at the hands of Patrick Grady has said the Tories have handled their own scandals better than the SNP.
The SNP staffer, who has spoken with the media on the condition of anonymity, has said he thinks his case would have been handled better if it had happened within the scandal-plagued Conservative Party rather than the SNP.
He told the Daily Mail he feared assisting a police investigation into the Glasgow North MP's conduct would create an “intolerable” working environment but said he did not want to think Grady, who was found by a parliament investigation to have stroked the neck, hair and face of the SNP staffer, had been “exonerated”.
The former party whip previously said he was “profoundly sorry” over his actions and then resigned his party membership after police launched an investigation into the incident in a London pub in 2016.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson 'lying' about Chris Pincher scandal, former chief civil servant says
Grady’s victim claimed the party has taken a softer approach than the Tories, who belatedly withdrew the whip from MP Chris Pincher last week following accusations that he drunkenly groped two men at a private club in London.
Evidence has since emerged that historic concerns about Pincher’s alleged conduct were well known within Westminster and the Conservative Party.
The victim said: “The SNP has been very quiet on the Pincher stuff – in normal times they would have been calling for his resignation.
“The Conservatives have put the SNP to shame with how they have handled Pincher.”
He claimed he would be “more protected” as a Tory staff member than he is as an SNP worker.
“[The Conservatives] have taken effective action, kicked him out of his job, removed the whip, and it is now up to the independent complaints and grievance scheme to investigate,” he said.
He added: “What the SNP has done with Patrick is totally different in that he kept the whip for the entire time, they kept him in the position of power and then isolated the victim and removed me from the equation.”
The SNP staff member criticised the party’s handling of the complaint. He told the paper: “As things stand, I don’t have to give Patrick any service as an MP.
“But if he is allowed back in at any moment that he decides, I’m not going to get fair warning of that – he could just turn up as an SNP MP if I go back to work.
READ MORE: Independence would be 'utterly tragic for the whole world,' Boris Johnson says
“It is concerning because it is all in his hands now if he wants to come back.
“The SNP seem to have absolved any responsibility now, which, as an employer, is concerning.
“It wasn’t me that even reported this to police. I don’t know who did. I never wanted to take this route but now that it has, he suspended his own membership.”
“I decided for it not to be investigated [by police] for fear it would impact on an already intolerable working environment,” he added.
And he said the SNP are sending the “wrong message” by letting Grady decide if he would like to reinstate his party membership.
A spokesman for the Metropolitan Police said: “On Wednesday June 22 police received a third party allegation of sexual assault that is said to have taken place in October 2016 at a commercial premises in Folgate Street, E1.
“Officers carried out inquiries including speaking to the alleged victim.
“There will be no further police action at this time.”
The SNP has said it would be up to Grady to decide his “intentions” on returning to the party as he “currently sits as an independent MP”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel