ONE of the few Tory MPs to take to the airwaves to defend the embattled Prime Minister erupted at a journalist during an interview.
Peter Bone, a Boris Johnson loyalist, is one of an increasingly small number of Conservatives willing to defend the Prime Minister during a wave of resignations which could end his time in Government.
The MP reacted furiously when interrupted by a female BBC News interviewer when interviewed on Wednesday afternoon.
READ MORE: Douglas Ross breaks silence as he calls for Boris Johnson to quit
He said his constituents were concerned about illegal immigration, “the cost of living, the terrible cost of living”.
Did… did Peter Bone just pretend his connection had dropped? pic.twitter.com/bYeK4LQrCb
— Tories That Are Helping (@RalphWiggumMP) July 6, 2022
“But they don’t talk about the Prime Minister,” he added.
The interviewer interjected: “Sorry to interrupt you Mr Bone but that hasn’t been borne out by recent by-election results has it, where you had Conservative candidates actively not putting the Prime Minister’s face or references to the Conservatives, barely, on their literature?”
Bone replied: “Well I would say you would want to interrupt me because you don’t want to know what people in my constituency think and they don’t agree with the BBC’s view and the bash Boris corporation continues to interrupt people when they’re trying to make their point.
“You just interrupted me about it.”
The interviewer interjected: “Well I guess it’s part of the interview process, interviewers sometimes … ”
An increasingly agitated Bone responded: “No, you’re supposed to what the person wants to say, not what you want to say.”
The MP, who yesterday accused Labour and LibDem MPs of only showing up at the Commons to “bash Boris”, is a member of the deeply conservative Cornerstone Group of Tory parliamentarians, and has voted in the past for restriction access to abortion and against abolishing the offences of blasphemy.
READ MORE: Michael Gove 'tells Prime Minister he must go' - report
He also voted against gay marriage.
Defending the Conservative Party, which has been plunged into chaos due to the Prime Minister’s handling of the Christopher Pincher scandal, he said Johnson’s critics were unable to criticise his policies because “he got the big calls correct”.
He added: “To be just a few points behind in the polls is a good position to be.
“It seems to me this is a case where people are playing the man not the ball.”
Asked whether the decision to promote Pincher despite being aware of substantial concerns about his conduct, which the Prime Minister has admitted was a “mistake”, was a “big call”, Pincher replied: “The Prime Minister said with hindsight he shouldn’t have been appointed.
“Well of course with hindsight, he shouldn’t have been.
“But I think originally he was appointed deputy chief whip by the former Prime Minister Mrs [Theresa] May and I don’t remember anyone in the media ever coming up to me and saying, ‘I don’t think Chris Pincher should be the deputy chief whip’.
READ MORE: Nadine Dorries hastily deletes tweet about Chancellor in latest gaffe
“Boris was overseas on important business and a member of parliament does something outrageous and stupid and he lost the whip and is no longer a Conservative MP.
“But to say that this is Boris’ fault is extraordinary.”
It has emerged that Johnson promoted Pincher – suspended from the Tory party pending a probe into allegations he recently sexually assaulted two men – despite knowing he had previously had a sexual misconduct complaint upheld against him in 2019.
The revelation triggered the resignation of Rishi Sunak and Sajid Javid from Cabinet and a further wave of other resignations, believed to be the biggest walk-out of ministers in as short a time in UK political history.
The Conservatives were handed two devastating by-election defeats this year in Wakefield and Tiverton and Honiton.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel