BARRISTER Jolyon Maugham quizzed Rishi Sunak in a now-deleted tweet on attitudes to race within the Conservative party.
In a deleted reply to Sunak’s leadership bid on Friday 8 July, he asked, “Do you think the members of your Party are ready to select a brown man, Rishi?”.
His tweet sparked debate on Twitter. Sunder Katwala, director of the think tank British Future stated in a thread in response to the tweet:
“Jolyon Maugham should not have posted this. I am glad he has deleted it. This kind of "imputed prejudice" (I'm not racist but I fear *they* are) was a v important barrier to minority voice & representation in the 80s & 90s. It has surely been increasingly proved wrong post-2010.”
Jolyon Maugham should not have posted this. I am glad he has deleted it. This kind of "imputed prejudice" (I'm not racist but I fear *they* are) was a v important barrier to minority voice & representation in the 80s & 90s. It has surely been increasingly proved wrong post-2010. pic.twitter.com/0oe0lVWMDH
— Sunder Katwala (@sundersays) July 8, 2022
However, writer Nels Abbey “totally and disrespectfully” disagreed with Katwala’s take, stating:
“There's nothing wrong whatsoever with what Jolyon Maugham posted. Asking a black or brown representative of the party of the Rwanda plan if said blatantly racist party would elect a them [sic] as leader is a fair & potentially anti-racist question.”
Abbey continued to argue that racist movements in the US and UK “now use Black and Brown people to further their agenda”, stating that “this is exactly how Boris Johnson played us for fools and used Priti Patel to push through racist policies”.
Totally and respectfully disagree. There's nothing wrong whatsoever with what Jolyon Maugham posted.
— Nels Abbey (@nelsabbey) July 8, 2022
Asking a black or brown representative of the party of the Rwanda plan if said blatantly racist party would elect a them as leader is a fair & potentially anti-racist question. https://t.co/59an5jJFb0
Maughan later posted a clarification about his now-deleted initial tweet, stating: “My point was, I want, we should all want, greater representation of people of colour leading all political parties. But it's not an issue particular to the Conservative Party.”
He later defended his initial position in a tweet posted on Saturday July 9, stating he was “taking no lectures” on racism from parliamentarians from the Conservative party, referencing numerous actions taken by them as justification.
These included Boris Johnson’s racist description of Black people as “piccaninnies”, the introduction of the Nationality and Borders act, the introduction of Voter ID which he stated disenfranchised people of colour from the voting process, and the “gaslighting” of survivors from the Windrush generation, amongst various other examples.
Am taking no lectures on racism from Parliamentarians in a Party that chose as its leader a man who described black people as "picaninies", which introduced the racist National and Borders Act, which introduced Voter ID to make it disproportionately more difficult for...
— Jo Maugham (@JolyonMaugham) July 9, 2022
However, Maugham also conceded that issues of race within politics was not exclusive to the Conservative party.
In a response to the point posed to him that “there are more people of colour in the Cabinet than the Shadow Cabinet”, and that Labour have never had a female leader, Maugham replied that this was a fair point, and that while representation is not a “proxy for fair engagement”, that “Labour’s record on representation is piss poor and it needs to do much better”.
In Scotland, 6 out of 129 MSPs are from minority ethnic backgrounds: two each from SNP, Labour and the Conservatives. This makes up 4.5% of the Scottish Parliament. Scotland has an estimated minority ethnic population of between 4 and 5%.
READ MORE: Sheku Bayoh's sister says Scotland is a racist country
Last year, the first women of colour were elected to the Scottish Parliament in its 22 year history, with Kaukab Stewart from the SNP and Pam Gosal of the Conservative Party elected in post.
However, “progress cannot be taken for granted”, said consultant and campaigner Talat Yaqoob, who pointed out in a statement to Holyrood magazine in 2021 that, “We still have many communities including black communities who have never had visible representation in our parliament, so there is a long way to go yet.”
One of the favourites to replace Johnson, who is set to remain in Number 10 until the autumn, Sunak launched his campaign video with the hashtag #Ready4Rishi.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel