THERE are calls for an immediate investigation into claims Boris Johnson lobbied for a young woman to get a City Hall job while he was London mayor.
It has been alleged that Johnson advocated for a role for the woman in 2008, just weeks after they met.
But the appointment is said to have been blocked because his colleague, Kit Malthouse, now a minister in the outgoing PM’s caretaker Cabinet, said the pair appeared to have an inappropriately close relationship.
The Sunday Times reported that the woman was upset by what happened, confronting Johnson about it several years later.
READ MORE: Hostility to ‘treacherous’ Rishi Sunak grows as big names launch Tory leadership campaigns
Daisy Cooper, the LibDems’ deputy leader, called for an investigation into the matter.
She said: “The woman’s account is deeply distressing to read and it’s clear this must be investigated immediately, either by a parliamentary body or City Hall authorities.
“British politics has been repeatedly dragged through the mud in recent weeks.
“It is utterly depressing that not only has another politician in high office been accused of abusing their power, but that it is now the sitting Prime Minister who faces serious questions.”
According to the Sunday Times report, the woman secured an interview for the role, but felt ill-qualified, and was unsuccessful.
The newspaper said she confronted Johnson nearly a decade later, during the #MeToo movement in 2017, when he admitted pushing her forward for the post.
READ MORE: Professor John Curtice says independence won't be hurt by resignation of Boris Johnson
He is said to have repeatedly apologised, telling the woman: “I’m very, very sorry, your unhappiness about this.”
But he denied any wrongdoing, according to the newspaper, saying: “I don’t believe that I was malicious and I don’t believe that I would have been aggressive or anything like that. I think that would be not fair.”
Labour’s deputy leader, Angela Rayner, said: “These awful allegations add to the lies, the law breaking and the security breaches – this man is not fit for office and should go now.”
A Downing Street spokesperson said: “This not about his time as PM and no public interest as I see it. And we don’t talk about his private life.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel