A PANDEMIC-LEVEL response is needed to address the energy bills crisis and avoid a “cata-strophic loss to life”, a Holyrood committee report has found.
The Scottish and UK Governments have been urged to provide immediate emergency support to help those struggling with rising fuel costs, the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee report said.
Efforts to help with the cost of living crisis are recognised by the committee but its report said additional financial help for households, better energy education, and acceleration of programmes to retrofit and insulate homes will help vulnerable people.
Committee convener Dean Lockhart said urgent action similar to that taken during the Covid-19 pandemic was needed to prevent “death” or “serious ill-health” for the worst-off Scots. He said: “This is a crisis unfolding in real time and one which we are told threatens a catastrophic loss of life if swift action is not taken.
READ MORE: Penny Mordaunt kicks off Tory leadership campaign with embarrassing gaffe
“We recognise some of the actions taken by the UK and Scottish Governments even over the short period of our inquiry, but more can and must be done now and in a more targeted way to get help to those most in need.
“Over the medium to long term, it is also clear that we need to escape dependence on volatile international energy markets and accelerate all our efforts to enable this.
“For now, our message is clear, the Scottish Government must demonstrate a targeted emergency response to this crisis, on a par with action taken during the pandemic, to ensure the least well off are not vulnerable to death or serious ill-health due to rising energy costs and associated cost-of-living expenses.”
The committee has backed the Scottish Government on the need to take action through available welfare provisions but asks ministers to set out how social security will be targeted specifically at lower income families with young children, those with disabilities, older people and those at risk of fuel poverty.
A national publicity campaign, similar to the Covid-19 warnings, so that Scots know where they can get support, is also recommended.
The MSPs urged the Scottish Government to speed up the plans for a programme of home heating and insulating. An investment commitment of £1.8 billion has been pledged. The committee plans to write to UK Energy Minister Greg Hands, to call for similar measures to be taken with reserved powers.
A Scottish Government spokesman said it would “carefully consider the findings of the committee” and continue to support consumers with the powers available to it.
“Powers relating to the energy markets remain reserved and we have repeatedly called for the UK Government to urgently take further, tangible actions to support households, including a temporary cut in energy bills VAT, further targeted financial assistance for those least able to afford their energy bills and four-nations discussions to develop an effective response to the energy bill increases,” the spokesman said.
“Scottish ministers have made clear their disappointment that the UK Government’s Energy Security Bill is a missed opportunity to tackle the cost of living crisis, failing to sufficiently deliver on key measures such as reducing the premium paid by households reliant on electric heating, accelerating energy efficiency and heat decarbonisation projects.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here