THE UK Government failed to heed warnings over the damage Brexit would do to Scotland’s food and farming sectors, despite “clearly being aware of the consequences”, a Scottish minister has said.
This follows the revelation that Tory leadership candidate and former International Trade Secretary Liz Truss was given detailed warnings by her own officials in 2020 that post-Brexit trade pacts with Australia and New Zealand would negatively impact the UK’s farming and food sectors.
Data obtained through a Freedom of Information request lodged by former shadow trade secretary Emily Thornberry and published in Politico this week showed that Truss was advised that the Australian and New Zealand deals would trigger significant ships in employment away from the semi-processed food sector, while also reducing its value to the UK economy. Truss was also warned that both deals would economically hurt agriculture, forestry and fishing.
Speaking to the National, Scotland’s Rural Affairs Secretary Mairi Gougeon said: “Brexit has inflicted significant and lasting damage on Scotland’s world class food and drink industries, rural and farming communities.
“I and other Scottish Ministers have repeatedly warned of the damaging consequences for Scotland’s farmers and crofters ever since the UK Government’s own scoping assessment showed Scotland’s agri-food and semi-processed food sectors losing out as a result of the proposed FTAs with Australia and New Zealand. It is bitterly disappointing that the UK Government did not listen to these warnings – despite clearly being aware of the consequences.
READ MORE: B Corp 'Best for the World' list sees 'disproportionate' number of Scottish firms
Gougeon added: “Trade deals like the FTA with New Zealand and Australia, do not come anywhere near offsetting the economic losses Scotland and the rest of the UK are suffering as a result of Brexit. Analysis of the impact of the agreement signed with New Zealand suggests an increase in UK GDP of just 0.03% over the next 15 years whilst suggesting that the agriculture and semi-processed food sectors across the UK will lose out as a result of this agreement.
“The door has meanwhile been opened to a significant increase to beef and sheep meat imports from New Zealand following on from the deal signed last year with Australia, which has already caused great concern in the agri-food sector in Scotland and the rest of the UK.”
Further criticism came from the National Farmers Union of Scotland, whose director of policy Jonnie Hall told The National: “The Government’s FTA track record to date is largely about deals with major agricultural and manufacturing economies relative to the UK who are looking for tertiary, service or digital trade in return, meaning that our agricultural interests and access to our food and drink sector have been cheap bargaining chips to secure what is seen as more lucrative market access for other sectors. There has been little or nothing in such trade deals for Scottish food or farming.
“What is becoming increasing apparent is the cumulative impact that all agreed FTAs are likely to have. With Australia and New Zealand completed, India and Canada under discussion amongst others, domestic producers are increasingly exposed to being undermined by growing volumes of produce derived from very different agricultural systems that operate with very different cost structures.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel