RISHI Sunak will “circumvent Holyrood” to implement key policies, Scottish Tory MP Andrew Bowie has claimed.
Writing for The Times, Bowie stated that this was as the Tory party “cannot trust the SNP to act in the best interests of the Scottish people”, claiming that Whitehall has a “devolve and forget” mentality which leads to “easy, lazy governing that says Scotland? Pass it to Holyrood”.
Elsewhere, Bowie claimed that Sunak played a “key role” in levelling-up funds being handed to councils, bypassing the Scottish Parliament, and that he “ensured that the SNP agreed to freeports coming to Scotland”.
The bypassing of the Scottish Parliament is a controversial suggestion, with Finance Secretary Kate Forbes previously having issued a warning to Westminster that levelling-up proposals should not be used to undermine Scottish devolution, as ministers get no say in how the funding is spent.
READ MORE: Out-of-touch Rishi Sunak revealed in 'working-class' gaffe clip
In a letter, Forbes said: “We have already made clear our view that while we welcome additional funding for Scotland, it is unacceptable for the UK Government to decide how money should be spent in areas of devolved responsibility, especially without any meaningful consultation or engagement.”
Bowie also took a jab at other Tory leadership candidates by stating that Sunak “went beyond easy platitudinous phrases that make us feel good about ourselves and our past” in discussions of the Union.
Bowie also claimed that Sunak was a “Unionist to his core”. The former chancellor has faced allegations that he does not care whether the Union is maintained or not.
Sunak was forced to take an overtly Unionist stance after a quote attributed to a fellow Conservative was made public. It said: “I remember discussing the future of the Union with Rishi and he argued that England should break away. He was advocating the end of the UK because it doesn’t make financial sense to him."
The National exclusively revealed earlier this week that Rishi Sunak stated in 2017 that the timing of indyref2 should be pushed back until Brexit has passed, adding that a “good deal” would strengthen the Union's case.
Following our report, Sunak's campaign team said he opposed indyref2.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel