A KEY advisor to Boris Johnson has suggested packing the House of Lords with Tory loyalists to avoid a repeat of the numerous defeats Johnson suffered there during his brief time as prime minister, reports say.
A document seen by ITV said that if there were around 40 more Conservatives in the upper house Johnson would have avoided around half of the defeats he suffered there.
The report comes from Robert Peston, ITV’s political editor. Peston said that Lynton Crosby's CT Group – which ran Johnson’s successful 2008 and 2012 London mayoral bids – had created “project Homer”.
Confidential documents seen by ITV say that, to stave off criticism, the new Tory lords should come from under-represented areas such as the north of England.
It also argues that controversial figures like the Daily Mail’s Paul Dacre should be handed peerages so that the media focuses on one person instead of the bigger picture.
As it stands, the Conservatives are already the largest group in the Lords with 257 peers, 47 of whom have hereditary seats.
There are 186 crossbenchers, 35 of whom are hereditary, and 166 Labour lords, just four of whom are hereditary. The LibDems have 83 lords, three of whom are hereditary.
A No 10 spokesperson told Peston: “This is not a government document and does not represent government policy. Unsolicited advice is often received – and disregarded.”
A spokesperson for CT said the document was “simply an early working copy of a discussion paper prepared for a think tank”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel