HUNDREDS of protesters are expected to rally at UK immigration detention centres in a bid to protest the Government’s “unprecedentedly racist and deliberately punishing” Rwanda scheme.
The demonstrations are in protest to the Home Office’s plan to send asylum seekers who they deem to have entered the UK illegally to Rwanda while their claims are “processed”.
The demonstrations - called by SOAS Detainee Support (SDS) and the Solidarity Knows No Borders Network and supported by Global Justice Now - will take place at immigration detention centres across the UK, including Brook House IRC and Colnbrook IRC, where protests were held hours before the grounding of the scheme’s first planned flight.
The protests at Brook House IRC and Colnbrook IRC will begin at 3pm on Saturday.
READ MORE: Tory leadership frontrunner Rishi Sunak will 'circumvent Holyrood', says Andrew Bowie
Other demonstration sites include Hassockfield, Manchester airport, and the former Campsfield IRC site which may be reopened for use for the Rwanda plan.
And on Sunday, migrants' rights groups and allies from across Scotland will protest at Dungavel House Removal Centre in South Lanarkshire.
The UK Government has already hit major roadblocks in implementing the scheme as a last-minute intervention from the European Court of Human Rights grounded the first flight of the scheme last month.
However, the Government has expressed its intention to push ahead with the controversial plan.
A judicial review of the scheme, brought by several individual asylum seekers as well as the PCS Union, Detention Action and Care4Calais, was originally scheduled to take place between July 19 and 21 in the High Court but the hearing has now been adjourned to September.
A detainee who has been given removal notice to Rwanda said: “They tell me I must go to Rwanda. Believe me, if I thought Rwanda was a safe option I would have gone there. And if I thought I would be safe in my country I would go back there in an instant.”
Talia U, lead organiser with Global Justice Stirling, said: “The Rwanda plan is another appalling piece of legislation that highlights the racist, colonial past of the UK. Forcing people fleeing dire situations to then be held in captivity, to then be shipped off like cattle to another country, should be unfathomable. We stand against the government's deplorable plan and in solidarity with refugees.
“The Government's latest decision to postpone flights till after leadership elections shows they are aware of the controversy they’ve created. We will keep mobilising to put shame on the Tory government, now until September when innocent people's fates will again be debated in court. Together we demand an immigration system where people can exercise their human right to seek asylum freely without being penalised for it.”
Pinar Aksu, human rights campaigner at the Maryhill Integration Network said: "We have had enough. The Rwanda sham is the latest cruel expansion of the Nationality and Borders Act. Sending people to Offshore processing centres should not be an option. It will create a system based on division and criminalise people. We need a compassionate, fair and just system based on human rights and international protection. People belong in communities, not in detention centres and detention-like conditions.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here