BUSINESS Secretary Kwasi Kwarteng’s taking free hospitality from Saudi Arabia’s state-owned oil firm shows the “hypocrisy” in the UK Government’s energy policy, the Scottish Greens have said.
Transparency data for the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) department revealed that Kwarteng travelled to the kingdom in late January this year on a commercial flight costing the taxpayer £4430.
But while travelling around Saudi Arabia, Kwarteng was flown by Aramco, one of the world’s biggest oil producers partially owned by the kingdom, to numerous cities.
Kwarteng also visited the Shaybah oil field with the Saudi energy minister, but this was not disclosed in the transparency data, and instead reported by Saudi press.
READ MORE: Scottish independence referendum showdown in Supreme Court sees first loss for UK
Kwarteng left the UK for Saudi Arabia on January 29. On January 30 he was flown by Aramco to Dammam, the country’s fifth most populous city, and then gifted an overnight stay at the firm’s guesthouses within their residential compound for workers. The camp is fenced in and only Aramco’s employees and their dependents can live there full time.
The next day, January 31, Kwarteng was flown by Aramco to Jubail, an eastern city on the Gulf coast, and then Riyadh, the kingdom’s capital and financial centre, and also had lunch provided for by the firm.
Kwarteng was also gifted a £300 Lenovo tablet, which transparency data lists as “held by department”. The business secretary returned to the UK on February 1.
However - one visit during the trip was not logged on the transparency data. The Saudi Gazette reports that Kwarteng visited the “super-giant” Shaybah oil field owned by Aramco on January 31, but there is no corresponding travel entry on the recently released hospitality disclosure log.
#PICTURES: #British Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Kwasi Kwarteng (@KwasiKwarteng) visited the super-giant Shaybah oil field located in the southeast of #SaudiArabia.https://t.co/mXXybBbyck pic.twitter.com/VhyA7bOGdl
— Saudi Gazette (@Saudi_Gazette) February 1, 2022
The field is more than 750km from Dammam, but has its own airport - built and operated by Aramco.
Kwarteng was pictured smiling in traditional Saudi clothing in the desert holding hands with Saudi energy minister Prince Abdulaziz Bin Salman.
It is unclear how Kwarteng could have made the journey without support from Aramco.
Opposition politicians have criticised Kwarteng taking the Saudi state’s hospitality, particularly in light of their human rights record, while others have questioned whether he has broken the ministerial code.
Ross Greer, Scottish Greens MSP, said: "The only thing more consistent than the UK government's fawning relationship with big oil is its grovelling dedication to pleasing the brutal Saudi dictatorship at all costs.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson survives no confidence vote AGAIN
“It may have one of the worst human rights records in the world, but that hasn't stopped Downing Street from arming and supporting the regime, with UK-made bombs and aircraft playing a central role in the brutal bombardment of Yemen.
"This is yet another example of the hypocrisy at the heart of UK foreign and energy policy. With independence we can take a different path, by investing in our renewable potential and standing up for human rights and democracy on the world stage."
Kerry McCarthy, Labour's shadow minister for climate change, told Insider: "It's bad enough that Conservative energy policy failures mean the UK has to go cap in hand to fossil fuel dictators.
“Now the Secretary of State must clarify whether he allowed oil money to pay for him to dine out and jet around Saudi Arabia."
The ministerial code states that “offers of free travel should not normally be accepted” unless the offer is made by a foreign government “provided no undue obligation is created”.
Although Aramco is majority state-owned, it is not part of the Saudi Arabian government.
Susan Hawley, executive director at Spotlight on Corruption, said: "As the ministerial code makes clear, UK ministers should clearly not be accepting hospitality and travel junkets when they make overseas visits from the likes of state-owned oil companies such as Saudi Aramco where there is any risk of undue obligations or influence being created.
"It is essential that the department release full details of these visits, what was discussed, and the purpose of the visit, with full costs of the hospitality and travel provided, so that the public can have confidence that no such undue obligations were created."
READ MORE: Back Off Scotland call for buffer zones as anti-abortion protesters gather in Glasgow
A BEIS spokesperson said: "Travel to and from Saudi Arabia was arranged by the British Government.
“These short, internal flights within Saudi Arabia were arranged by the Saudi government and have been properly and publicly declared, as is required."
Saudi press also reported that Kwaseng had "introductory visits to several companies to learn about their most important products" while in Jubail, but the details were not published by BEIS.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel