PERTH has been put on "amber alert for flying debris" as Tory leadership hopefuls head to the city, an SNP MP has joked.
SNP shadow Commons leader Pete Wishart, MP for the city, mocked the “ferocious” contest between Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak, with Perth the location of a debate between the pair on August 16.
He said the barbed comments from candidates made a "bag of rats" look tame by comparison.
Commons Leader Mark Spencer (below) ignored the criticism but joked he is praying for his survival in the next Government.
Speaking at business questions, Wishart told the Commons: “Can we have a debate about rats in the sack?
READ MORE: Ruth Davidson backs law-breaking Sunak for next PM despite Boris Johnson attacks
“There’s a confrontation going on just now that would make these much-maligned rodents seem like sedated gerbils on tranquilisers.
“This is ferocious, unrestrained stuff, there’s no mercy shown and they’re going for the kill.
“Accusations, poison barbs, simmering resentment, and that’s just what they’re saying about each other in their own camps.”
Wishart joked he could be a peacemaker, adding: “The leadership circus is coming to Perth and already we’ve put the city on an amber warning with the threat of flying debris.
“This could be even worse than what we’ve had in the heatwave.”
Wishart suggested Spencer has been “a little bit close to the big dog” Boris Johnson, but added: “We hope to see him here when we return in September.”
Spencer, speaking on the final day before summer recess, replied: “I too pray for my survival.”
He went on to criticise the Scottish Government’s record in power, noting of the SNP: “Maybe it’s time they stop their ideological fixation on independence but we know why they’re doing it, we know what they want to cover up.
“The CBI and KPMG have produced reports showing that Scotland lags behind the rest of the UK in nine out of 13 productivity indicators.
“On education, the First Minister said she would be judged on her Government’s ability to narrow the attainment gap between schools in poorer and wealthier areas, and she even said she’d be willing to put her neck on the line for this pledge – and then she dropped her promise to help poorer students in Scotland.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel