THE UK Government has already paid Rwanda £120 million to take migrants despite the deal being grounded by legal challenges.
Officials for the east African nation’s government confirmed it has received the entire initial payment for the agreement signed in April, despite not having received a single asylum seeker for "processing".
Last month Downing Street conceded that some cash had been paid but refused to say how much or when this had happened, saying the information was “confidential”.
The first deportation flight was grounded in June after a series of legal challenges and another attempt is yet to scheduled.
When asked by reporters how much money had already been paid by the UK, Rwandan government spokeswoman Yolande Makolo said: “There was an initial transfer of £120m. This has already been paid and we are already using the funds to prepare.”
Rwanda remains “committed” to the partnership, she added.
Several asylum seekers, the Public and Commercial Services union and charities Care4Calais, Detention Action and Asylum Aid are challenging the legality of the Home Office policy, with the next court hearings due in September and October.
The ongoing court cases have raised the prospect that a flight may not be attempted again until the winter.
Some migrants issued with Rwanda removal directions have already been released from immigration detention because, as yet, another flight has not been lined up.
Earlier this week the Commons Home Affairs Committee found there is “no evidence” that the policy is acting as a deterrent.
READ MORE: Liz Truss said she wanted 'referenda on major constitutional issues'
The UK Government was also slammed for ignoring accusations that Rwanda had previously sent refugees to neighbouring countries to fight in armed combat.
The policy has previously been described as a "cataclysmic waste of taxpayers’ money" by the SNP shadow home secretary Stuart McDonald MP.
He said: “The UK Government’s decision to proceed with this abhorrent policy is utterly shameful and will only add to the pain and suffering being felt by those fleeing their homeland.
“Every single person making the perilous journey across the English Channel should be treated with dignity and compassion – something this Tory government are completely devoid of. However, not only is this morally wrong – it is a cataclysmic waste of taxpayers’ money."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel