THE Tory government has been told to stop using cancer research as a “political football”.
The warning comes after a Glasgow-based, world-leading cancer expert said he was considering moving a major research project abroad because of a Brexit-linked impasse over EU funding.
Dr Payam Gammage, of the Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, and who is a world expert in how DNA in the cell’s energy factories – mitochondria – mutate to become the engines of cancer, recently won £2 million in EU funding but is unable to access it because of the impasse.
He is among a number of researchers who have expressed concern after talks aimed at securing associate membership of the £80 billion Horizon Europe programme collapsed. The lack of progress, which is connected to disagreement over the post-Brexit Northern Ireland protocol, led to UK-based European Research Council (ERC) awardees being informed that grants would be terminated unless they move projects to the EU or an associated country.
READ MORE: Huge Brexit cost for workers in Scotland revealed in new report
Now Dr Ian Walker of Cancer Research UK has called for the next Prime Minister and Government to “break the impasse”.
He said that otherwise, Gammage and others like him would be forced to choose between hoping the Horizon Europe association would be ratified and be unable to access the money in the meantime – or take the “gamble” of applying to the UK Research and Innovation for funding.
Walker said: “Cancer research is tangled up in the ongoing political dispute on the Northern Ireland Protocol.
“The UK’s future involvement in Horizon Europe, the EU’s flagship programme for funding scientific research with a budget of more than £80bn hangs precariously in the balance.”
Walking away from Horizon Europe now because of the dispute would mean cancer scientists and patients in the UK, EU, and further afield would be the biggest losers, Walker warned.
“The EU’s recent flagship Cancer Mission is funding talented scientists working together through Horizon Europe to support the research needed to deliver significant improvements in cancer prevention, diagnosis and treatment,” he said.
He added that while the UK Government had been “talking up” its “Plan B”, it was unlikely to match up to Horizon Europe.
“UK scientists shouldn’t feel the need to make the choice between moving to an EU member state to guarantee Horizon Europe funding or taking the gamble of a UK only replacement. Some may end up voting with their feet which will have dire consequences for the UK’s ambitions to become a science superpower” he said.
Walker added that a “big task” for the next prime minister and government would be to “break the impasse” over the protocol.
He said: “My message to them is simple – it’s time to stop using cancer research as a political football. Both the UK and EU must keep the commitment to an association agreement alive, and the new prime minister must commit to protecting the UK’s planned financial commitment to Horizon Europe in full. Plan A is still the best option for British science and the British people.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel