A MEMBER of the House of Lords has said that the UK Government should cut Scotland’s budget after suggesting it was “illegally spending money on reserved areas.”
In a column in The Mail on Sunday Lord George Foulkes, a former Labour Scotland Office minister, said the Scottish Government was spending money on reserved areas including “the cost of publications preparing for a second independence referendum which will not take place.”
Foulkes has spoken previously in the House of Lords calling on the UK Government to monitor the Scottish Government’s spending.
READ MORE: Scottish independence planning should be BANNED by UK Government, Lord Foulkes says
He also questioned the validity of the SNP’s mandate to hold a second independence referendum.
An SNP spokesperson said: “The irony will not be lost on anyone in Scotland that Lord Foulkes, who sits in the undemocratic House of Lords is denying the democratic mandate delivered by the people of Scotland for an independence referendum.”
In May, it was announced that the Scottish Government was allocating £20 million towards an independence referendum.
Foulkes’ column specifically suggested that the UK Government should cut the budget by “the amount spent wrongly” and suggested that it should consider using the courts as a means of stopping “illegal expenditure.”
He wrote: “I accept that none of these are easy options but if no action is taken Nicola Sturgeon will continue to thumb her nose at the UK Government and is likely to be emboldened to go even further.
“I know the UK Government is currently hesitant about taking action, worried a backlash against them might take place in Scotland.
“However, it is my strong belief and experience, not just from the echo chambers of Twitter but also from the reaction I get from people who know my view, in the street and elsewhere, that there is mounting anger at the way in which the Scottish Government is both acting illegally and allowing services in Scotland to decline inexorably.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel