RUMOURS that Boris Johnson is being touted as a potential secretary general of Nato have been dismissed and derided by senior members of the SNP and Labour.
The Daily Telegraph this week reported that the erstwhile Prime Minister could assume the role if the incumbent - former Norwegian prime minister Jens Stoltenberg - steps down in September next year, and may be favoured for the position due to “US distrust around any European Union figures taking the job given repeated suggestions of plans for a new EU army.”
Conservative MP and defence select committee member Richard Drax told the Telegraph: “Any distinguished Brit would be a great choice. If indeed that is what Boris Johnson wants to go and do, of course I would support that.”
Drax’s defence committee colleague Mark Francois added: “People will probably argue over Boris Johnson’s legacy for years – but one thing which is clearly inarguable is his absolutely staunch support for Ukraine in the face of Russian barbarity.
“If he were to apply to become the secretary general of Nato, I suspect he could rely on President Zelensky for a reference.”
READ MORE: Would Nato make indy Scotland keep nukes for 10 years?
However, an unnamed Ministry of Defence source expressed doubt that Johnson would gain the appointment, due to the likelihood of a veto by French President Emmanuel Macron.
Responding to the report, the SNP’s vocally pro-Nato defence spokesperson Stewart McDonald voiced even greater scepticism, tweeting: “Won’t happen”.
Labour deputy leader Angela Rayner also mocked the possibility of Johnson heading the nuclear alliance by referring to his controversial 2018 meeting with Alexander Lebedev, commenting on Twitter: “The man who secretly met a former KGB agent after a crucial NATO summit and can’t remember what he discussed or who he was with? I think it’s a ‘no’.”
Elsewhere on social media, the lawyer and human rights advocate Aamer Anwar responded to the Telegraph’s report by tweeting simply: “The End of the World is Nigh”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel